Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
A Cylance Smart Antivirus Quickie
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 58943" data-source="post: 758399"><p>WD is pretty much established as a system hog. I am always amazed at how fat and useless my systems feel after I do a fresh W10 restore. Once WD is disabled, they fly like the wind again. For that reason alone, I'd use Cylance over WD (with appropriately addressing vectors) Your other points are very valid though. Using Cylance alone would be a mistake and a home user would be misled by it - potentially - thinking they are fully protected when clearly, they wouldn't be with vanilla Cylance. Average home users would be far far better suited to 'anything' else. Even McAfee with the new engine introduced in May would provide better protection and cost almost nothing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 58943, post: 758399"] WD is pretty much established as a system hog. I am always amazed at how fat and useless my systems feel after I do a fresh W10 restore. Once WD is disabled, they fly like the wind again. For that reason alone, I'd use Cylance over WD (with appropriately addressing vectors) Your other points are very valid though. Using Cylance alone would be a mistake and a home user would be misled by it - potentially - thinking they are fully protected when clearly, they wouldn't be with vanilla Cylance. Average home users would be far far better suited to 'anything' else. Even McAfee with the new engine introduced in May would provide better protection and cost almost nothing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
