Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Moonhorse" data-source="post: 814798" data-attributes="member: 72712">Ok i have been testing smart, and i must admit its doing very well imo1. i have disabled traces Web Request Controller , so smartadblock is only blocker in work[ATTACH=full]213691[/ATTACH]I have never heard of WS tech 200, but it seems doing good work,i have added adversity, urhauls and squid ad filter, since there all small lists[ATTACH=full]213692[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]213693[/ATTACH]3. probably should run cpu tests, but ram footprint is for sure less than ublock has , ps props for blocksi being lightest malware/phishing filterPs. easylist is always detected on browserleaks, so i tried to find alternative for it....and WSTech 200 did replace that<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Moonhorse, post: 814798, member: 72712"] Ok i have been testing smart, and i must admit its doing very well imo 1. i have disabled traces Web Request Controller , so smartadblock is only blocker in work [ATTACH type="full" alt="213691"]213691[/ATTACH] I have never heard of WS tech 200, but it seems doing good work, i have added adversity, urhauls and squid ad filter, since there all small lists [ATTACH type="full" alt="213692"]213692[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="213693"]213693[/ATTACH] 3. probably should run cpu tests, but ram footprint is for sure less than ublock has , ps props for blocksi being lightest malware/phishing filter Ps. easylist is always detected on browserleaks, so i tried to find alternative for it....and WSTech 200 did replace that:emoji_thinking: [/QUOTE]

Verification