Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Windows_Security" data-source="post: 816941" data-attributes="member: 50782">Hi,I help IT-startups with positioning, branding, (marketing) messaging and sales (I have worked in London City with the best, look up Landor Associates for example). Your proposal als was the first name that came to mind, because it is the closest to your current product name.How ever . . . Smart Adblocker might be distinctive enough to circumvent IP-issues with it also has some lesser annotations. There are a lot of clones of (mostly) uBlockOrigin and Adblock(Plus) in the Chrome store. Most a superlative naming description to position themselves as the better alternative (to the original). Sadly most of them are just clones and some of them are malicious. Just have a look at this thread on this forum (<a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/fake-malicious-extensions-on-chrome-web-store.76867/page-4#post-708668" target="_blank">link</a>).So this new name would solve a problem and might create another one (as we say in Dutch) puts you in the corner of the malicous-clones extensions (remember &quot;I don&#039;t trust them&quot; post of SumTingWong). So I give you something to consider: When you go for a descriptive name, why not incorporate both functions: adblocker and popup-blocker or brainstorm on what benefits your extension is or what your product promise is?Browse this thread and write down what advantages (DeepWeb &quot;SmartAdBlock makes three extensions obsolete&quot;) and remarks (Oldschool &quot; Needed to be included Smart to find your extension in the ChromeStore&quot;) forum members have posted.&nbsp; Try naming conventions from different angles.[ATTACH=full]214324[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Windows_Security, post: 816941, member: 50782"] Hi, I help IT-startups with positioning, branding, (marketing) messaging and sales (I have worked in London City with the best, look up Landor Associates for example). Your proposal als was the first name that came to mind, because it is the closest to your current product name. How ever . . . Smart Adblocker might be distinctive enough to circumvent IP-issues with it also has some lesser annotations. There are a lot of clones of (mostly) uBlockOrigin and Adblock(Plus) in the Chrome store. Most a superlative naming description to position themselves as the better alternative (to the original). Sadly most of them are just clones and some of them are malicious. Just have a look at this thread on this forum ([URL='https://malwaretips.com/threads/fake-malicious-extensions-on-chrome-web-store.76867/page-4#post-708668']link[/URL]). So this new name would solve a problem and might create another one (as we say in Dutch) puts you in the corner of the malicous-clones extensions (remember "I don't trust them" post of SumTingWong). So I give you something to consider: [B] When you go for a descriptive name, why not incorporate both functions: adblocker and popup-blocker or brainstorm on what benefits your extension is or what your product promise is?[/B] Browse this thread and write down what advantages (DeepWeb "SmartAdBlock makes three extensions obsolete") and remarks (Oldschool " Needed to be included Smart to find your extension in the ChromeStore") forum members have posted. Try naming conventions from different angles. [ATTACH type="full" alt="214324"]214324[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification