Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
A Microsoft Defender Follow-up
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 998455" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>That is true. The MSI infection vector is usually depreciated (not only for ransomware), probably because it is relatively rare. A similar problem was with scripting attacks a few years ago. </p><p></p><p>In Defender, the ASR rules mostly ignore MSI files and I am not sure if the cloud-delivered protection even supports MSI files. The Microsoft documentation mentioned the support for:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Automatic file submission: files like .bat, .scr, .dll, .exe.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"> BAFS: files such as .js, .vbs, or macros and executable files.</li> </ol><p>But I have nowhere seen clearly enumerated MSI files. Also, the ISG reputation feature in Microsoft Application Control does not support MSI files. </p><p>I noticed that MSI files are supported by Smart Application Control on Windows 11. Of course, SmartScreen for Explorer supports MSI too.</p><p></p><p>I am afraid that the problem is more general than Microsoft's approach. For example, the Avast CyberCapture and Hardened mode do not support MSI files too. From several posts on other forums, it follows that Bitdefender detected Magniber for a few weeks only via signatures, etc.</p><p>So, the most popular free AVs have got rather poor support for MSI files.</p><p>Let's hope that AV vendors will face seriously this problem soon.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 998455, member: 32260"] That is true. The MSI infection vector is usually depreciated (not only for ransomware), probably because it is relatively rare. A similar problem was with scripting attacks a few years ago. In Defender, the ASR rules mostly ignore MSI files and I am not sure if the cloud-delivered protection even supports MSI files. The Microsoft documentation mentioned the support for: [LIST=1] [*]Automatic file submission: files like .bat, .scr, .dll, .exe. [*] BAFS: files such as .js, .vbs, or macros and executable files. [/LIST] But I have nowhere seen clearly enumerated MSI files. Also, the ISG reputation feature in Microsoft Application Control does not support MSI files. I noticed that MSI files are supported by Smart Application Control on Windows 11. Of course, SmartScreen for Explorer supports MSI too. I am afraid that the problem is more general than Microsoft's approach. For example, the Avast CyberCapture and Hardened mode do not support MSI files too. From several posts on other forums, it follows that Bitdefender detected Magniber for a few weeks only via signatures, etc. So, the most popular free AVs have got rather poor support for MSI files. Let's hope that AV vendors will face seriously this problem soon. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top