Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
A new forensic school of thought
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yellowing" data-source="post: 748816" data-attributes="member: 72894"><p>That is not a valid syllogism, I think. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite119" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite125" alt=":LOL:" title="Laugh :LOL:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":LOL:" /> (Also people who didn't pay had non-monetary-damage done to them.)</p><p>You don't write code that resolves around an exploit you discovered when you don't know if it works, imo. It sounds like a huge waste of time. Something is an exploit if it works. There's no reason to test if it does work on millions of computers running the same software as you. You only have to test if <strong>you </strong>actually have the same/newest software and then you know it will. :X3: (You can also test various security software alongside)</p><p></p><p>I think you are trying to glorify criminals.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite113" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /> I mean, just read that first sentence again that I quoted. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite111" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> And calling them a scientist if they are criminal hackers is a stretch.</p><p></p><p></p><p>PS: I'm not an expert, I don't code malware, but I'm pretty logical, I think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yellowing, post: 748816, member: 72894"] That is not a valid syllogism, I think. :rolleyes: :LOL: (Also people who didn't pay had non-monetary-damage done to them.) You don't write code that resolves around an exploit you discovered when you don't know if it works, imo. It sounds like a huge waste of time. Something is an exploit if it works. There's no reason to test if it does work on millions of computers running the same software as you. You only have to test if [B]you [/B]actually have the same/newest software and then you know it will. :X3: (You can also test various security software alongside) I think you are trying to glorify criminals.:confused: I mean, just read that first sentence again that I quoted. :( And calling them a scientist if they are criminal hackers is a stretch. PS: I'm not an expert, I don't code malware, but I'm pretty logical, I think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top