Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
A quick Malwarebytes 3.0 test
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fabian Wosar" data-source="post: 576314" data-attributes="member: 24327"><p>How do you know the plain anti-virus/anti-malware vendor doesn't? Plain is a very deceptive thing. I think we can all agree, that Windows Defender is one of the most basic anti-virus out there. But you would be surprised about what kind of tech is working in the background. A lot of stuff you don't notice at all on the surface.</p><p></p><p>So why not just assume it does and add the extra 1 or 2 minutes of work to download the samples instead of just copying them? If it would make a difference, you get more accurate results. If it doesn't, you get the same results as before, but someone can't discredit your test because you "didn't replicate the attack vector".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fabian Wosar, post: 576314, member: 24327"] How do you know the plain anti-virus/anti-malware vendor doesn't? Plain is a very deceptive thing. I think we can all agree, that Windows Defender is one of the most basic anti-virus out there. But you would be surprised about what kind of tech is working in the background. A lot of stuff you don't notice at all on the surface. So why not just assume it does and add the extra 1 or 2 minutes of work to download the samples instead of just copying them? If it would make a difference, you get more accurate results. If it doesn't, you get the same results as before, but someone can't discredit your test because you "didn't replicate the attack vector". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top