Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Ad Blockers and Privacy Extensions Test 1
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 719101" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>I tested the same with google chrome 65 and it blocked 2/5, 1 link was dead</p><p></p><p>the weird thing is when I tested google chrome portable 64 (older) it blocked nothing although the protect was surely enabled</p><p>so chrome 65 > chrome 64, don't understand</p><p>2 minutes later, tested again with chrome 64, it blocked 2/5</p><p>firefox has a delayed database too, so 0/5 is expected</p><p></p><p>don't know why there is an inconsistency</p><p></p><p>ok, the conclusion, adguard has improved since the test I did last year. They surely added their own database besides GSB for the extension while adguard for windows still solely uses GSB</p><p></p><p>I added some filters to my uBO, it blocked everything</p><p>that's why I don't like adguard because I can't control what filters I want to add</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 719101, member: 51905"] I tested the same with google chrome 65 and it blocked 2/5, 1 link was dead the weird thing is when I tested google chrome portable 64 (older) it blocked nothing although the protect was surely enabled so chrome 65 > chrome 64, don't understand 2 minutes later, tested again with chrome 64, it blocked 2/5 firefox has a delayed database too, so 0/5 is expected don't know why there is an inconsistency ok, the conclusion, adguard has improved since the test I did last year. They surely added their own database besides GSB for the extension while adguard for windows still solely uses GSB I added some filters to my uBO, it blocked everything that's why I don't like adguard because I can't control what filters I want to add [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top