Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Windows_Security" data-source="post: 803026" data-attributes="member: 50782"><p>Not an expert on DNS. I used Norton DNS, simply because it was a big name doing well in tests. When I heared that Norton extension (based on this data) was phased out I switched to Quad9. Chosing quad9 was also because it did well in a test I read somewhere and Quad9 gets its security info from 19 partners from which I recognised, IBM, Abuse.ch, Netlab and F-Secure. Making the simple conclusion that when it scores reasonably&nbsp; well in a tests and is backed with some reputable names it would be okay to use <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite113" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /> But I am open to suggestions <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Windows_Security, post: 803026, member: 50782"] Not an expert on DNS. I used Norton DNS, simply because it was a big name doing well in tests. When I heared that Norton extension (based on this data) was phased out I switched to Quad9. Chosing quad9 was also because it did well in a test I read somewhere and Quad9 gets its security info from 19 partners from which I recognised, IBM, Abuse.ch, Netlab and F-Secure. Making the simple conclusion that when it scores reasonably well in a tests and is backed with some reputable names it would be okay to use :confused: But I am open to suggestions :) [/QUOTE]

Verification