Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
General Apps
AdGuard
AdGuard becomes the world's first public DNS-over-QUIC resolver!
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HarborFront" data-source="post: 919148" data-attributes="member: 55987"><p>Some info on QUIC here</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/122361/is-quic-quick-udp-internet-connections-safe-to-allow-through-firewall[/URL]</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.fastvue.co/fastvue/blog/googles-quic-protocols-security-and-reporting-implications/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://ma.ttias.be/googles-quic-protocol-moving-web-tcp-udp/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>The question is should one enables QUIC in the browser despite the slight performance it gains over privacy issue and does your firewall inspect QUIC traffic?</p><p></p><p>Quote from comment</p><p></p><p>The ‘QUIC’ protocol (Google originated BTW) appears to be insecure against webtracking by commercial as well as govt. trackers & surveillance. A user/browser may be (passively) uniquely tracked across a browsing session (and possibly across multiple sessions in some instances), without the need for cookies, other trackers, or fingerprinting, according to a recent University of Hamburg paper:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/popets/2019/3/article-p255.pdf" target="_blank">https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/popets/2019/3/article-p255.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>Thus, probably best not to enable this in your browser if you are privacy-minded, until this hole is patched … (I haven’t been able to find any mention that browser vendors have even addressed this to-date)</p><p></p><p>QUIC has already been enabled in Chrome for quite some time, surprise, surprise (Google builds in yet another hidden, powerful privacy-shredding tracker into its next-generation web technology and as well as its 60%-market-share-browser?? There’s a shocker for ya…)</p><p>You can disable this in most Chromium-based browsers, tho’, and/or otherwise at your OS firewall:</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.bitdefender.com/support/how-to-disable-quic-protocol-in-google-chrome-1669.html" target="_blank">How to disable QUIC protocol in Google Chrome</a></p><p></p><p>Unquote</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HarborFront, post: 919148, member: 55987"] Some info on QUIC here [URL unfurl="true"]https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/122361/is-quic-quick-udp-internet-connections-safe-to-allow-through-firewall[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.fastvue.co/fastvue/blog/googles-quic-protocols-security-and-reporting-implications/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://ma.ttias.be/googles-quic-protocol-moving-web-tcp-udp/[/URL] The question is should one enables QUIC in the browser despite the slight performance it gains over privacy issue and does your firewall inspect QUIC traffic? Quote from comment The ‘QUIC’ protocol (Google originated BTW) appears to be insecure against webtracking by commercial as well as govt. trackers & surveillance. A user/browser may be (passively) uniquely tracked across a browsing session (and possibly across multiple sessions in some instances), without the need for cookies, other trackers, or fingerprinting, according to a recent University of Hamburg paper: [URL]https://content.sciendo.com/downloadpdf/journals/popets/2019/3/article-p255.pdf[/URL] Thus, probably best not to enable this in your browser if you are privacy-minded, until this hole is patched … (I haven’t been able to find any mention that browser vendors have even addressed this to-date) QUIC has already been enabled in Chrome for quite some time, surprise, surprise (Google builds in yet another hidden, powerful privacy-shredding tracker into its next-generation web technology and as well as its 60%-market-share-browser?? There’s a shocker for ya…) You can disable this in most Chromium-based browsers, tho’, and/or otherwise at your OS firewall: [URL='https://www.bitdefender.com/support/how-to-disable-quic-protocol-in-google-chrome-1669.html']How to disable QUIC protocol in Google Chrome[/URL] Unquote [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top