Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Software Troubleshooting
AdGuard filter help wanted
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lenny_Fox" data-source="post: 935983" data-attributes="member: 82776"><p>bosch-home.nl,neff-home.com#@#.o-cookielaw</p><p></p><p>When I remember Yuki's critique (or better tips) on my rules correctly, as long as you use domain names, it does not matter a lot performance wise whether you write it in a single rule or combine them as shown above. When you look at Easylist and Adguard filters, it seems best practice to combine them in a single rule.</p><p></p><p>UBlockOrigin has an option to exclude generic rules and disable cosmetic filtering both for performance reasons, so my guess is that generic cosmetic filters should be kept to a minimum (performance wise). So my advice is not to use a generic exception rule (but use AG's really good rule wizzard for each website you encounter the problem).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lenny_Fox, post: 935983, member: 82776"] bosch-home.nl,neff-home.com#@#.o-cookielaw When I remember Yuki's critique (or better tips) on my rules correctly, as long as you use domain names, it does not matter a lot performance wise whether you write it in a single rule or combine them as shown above. When you look at Easylist and Adguard filters, it seems best practice to combine them in a single rule. UBlockOrigin has an option to exclude generic rules and disable cosmetic filtering both for performance reasons, so my guess is that generic cosmetic filters should be kept to a minimum (performance wise). So my advice is not to use a generic exception rule (but use AG's really good rule wizzard for each website you encounter the problem). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top