Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Advanced Threat Protection Test 2022 – Consumer
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anthony Qian" data-source="post: 1011707" data-attributes="member: 91446"><p>Very interesting results.</p><p></p><p>Some products (McAfee and Avira) perform well in AV-C's malware protection test but very poorly in this APT test. Some product (ESET) fails to get a 3-star certificate in malware protection tests, but turns out to be the best product in this APT test. Other products (Kaspersky and Bitdefender) generally perform well in both regular malware protection tests and this APT test. Anybody know why?</p><p></p><p>My thoughts on this seemingly irrational results:</p><p></p><p>According to my observation, some products like McAfee and Avira are continuously monitoring new samples uploaded to VirusTotal and immidiately block the samples that are not detected by themselves but detected by other trusted vendors. This strategy works out well in AV-C's malware protection tests as most samples may have been uploaded to VirusTotal. But it didn't work out well in the APT test which is focused on <strong>fileless </strong>attack. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps, something like this APT test can best indicate a product's true ability to block malware.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anthony Qian, post: 1011707, member: 91446"] Very interesting results. Some products (McAfee and Avira) perform well in AV-C's malware protection test but very poorly in this APT test. Some product (ESET) fails to get a 3-star certificate in malware protection tests, but turns out to be the best product in this APT test. Other products (Kaspersky and Bitdefender) generally perform well in both regular malware protection tests and this APT test. Anybody know why? My thoughts on this seemingly irrational results: According to my observation, some products like McAfee and Avira are continuously monitoring new samples uploaded to VirusTotal and immidiately block the samples that are not detected by themselves but detected by other trusted vendors. This strategy works out well in AV-C's malware protection tests as most samples may have been uploaded to VirusTotal. But it didn't work out well in the APT test which is focused on [B]fileless [/B]attack. Perhaps, something like this APT test can best indicate a product's true ability to block malware. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top