Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1120244" data-attributes="member: 114717">Stock Analysts and whales manipulating the AMD stock for their own profit has more to do with AMD share price than CEO Lisa Su.AMD is not sticking it to Intel. Intel dominates the global PC chip market share. Plus there are far, far, far more powerful interests backing Intel than AMD. Intel can be a complete s h e e t show and even the PRC and Taiwan will do everything they can to allow it to prevent it from failing. Intel brings a dominating amount of direct and indirect profit to those nations&#039; digital industrial bases.When there are more digital devices shipped with AMD chips than Intel, only then can anybody state that &quot;AMD is sticking it to Intel.&quot;&quot;Sticking it to Intel&quot; is not good for the world. It certainly is not good for the consumer market and your pocket money.If I were CEO Lisa Su, and I could supplant Intel. Once I did that I would double and triple the cost of AMD products and stick it to you people. She would do the same. It is absolutely certain that she would do just that because that is what creates profit - which is her primary responsibility - to generate profit for shareholders. Her job is not to provide better chips at lower cost to consumers. That is not her game plan.Does anyone here even bother to read AMD shareholder reports or listen to the conference calls? AMD is not your friend. AMD only truly cares about shareholders.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1120244, member: 114717"] Stock Analysts and whales manipulating the AMD stock for their own profit has more to do with AMD share price than CEO Lisa Su. AMD is not sticking it to Intel. Intel dominates the global PC chip market share. Plus there are far, far, far more powerful interests backing Intel than AMD. Intel can be a complete s h e e t show and even the PRC and Taiwan will do everything they can to allow it to prevent it from failing. Intel brings a dominating amount of direct and indirect profit to those nations' digital industrial bases. When there are more digital devices shipped with AMD chips than Intel, only then can anybody state that "AMD is sticking it to Intel." "Sticking it to Intel" is not good for the world. It certainly is not good for the consumer market and your pocket money. If I were CEO Lisa Su, and I could supplant Intel. Once I did that I would double and triple the cost of AMD products and stick it to you people. She would do the same. It is absolutely certain that she would do just that because that is what creates profit - which is her primary responsibility - to generate profit for shareholders. Her job is not to provide better chips at lower cost to consumers. That is not her game plan. Does anyone here even bother to read AMD shareholder reports or listen to the conference calls? AMD is not your friend. AMD only truly cares about shareholders. [/QUOTE]

Verification