Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Microsoft Defender
AMSI .Net and reducing the attack surface
Message
<blockquote data-quote="notabot" data-source="post: 844621" data-attributes="member: 75970"><p>I see your point, AMSI of course can't stop an exploit, but for .net there's little it can do for the payload itself, unless in a quite low probability scenario part of the payload is already delivered as an assembly.</p><p> What about remoting in .net? these days I don't know anyone who develops using in-framework remoting as either rest calls or grpc have become industry standards but if the framework still supports remote loading, this does reduce the attack surface.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="notabot, post: 844621, member: 75970"] I see your point, AMSI of course can't stop an exploit, but for .net there's little it can do for the payload itself, unless in a quite low probability scenario part of the payload is already delivered as an assembly. What about remoting in .net? these days I don't know anyone who develops using in-framework remoting as either rest calls or grpc have become industry standards but if the framework still supports remote loading, this does reduce the attack surface. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
