Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Guides - Privacy & Security Tips
Anti-Virus & Malware = Myths and Facts
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaspion" data-source="post: 173730" data-attributes="member: 8794"><p>Thanks everybody for your shared opinions. This has been indeed a productive continuation to the original discussion started in this thread,</p><p>and it's good that no one has broken this great combo with personal attacks. After all, we're all here to learn and share knowledge.</p><p></p><p>At this point, one thing still bothers me. I suspect this is a very important issue that has been largely overlooked here. It is the case for Virtual Machine tests in evaluating antivirus/antimalware solutions.</p><p></p><p>If n.nvt and Littlebits are correct, VMs <em>do not</em> represent real live machines well enough because the virtual system doesn't have the same level of access to the machine's resources, meaning the AV also doesn't have access to all the resources it needs to work properly. Is that correct? Because this would mean that so many users here doing VM tests are just doing little more than playing a type of video-game: it's cool to watch, but doesn't belong to real life.</p><p></p><p>Another thing I would like n.nvt to clear up is the difference in trial vs. paid. Is the difference only the obvious time limit or is the protection level diminished as well?</p><p></p><p>Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaspion, post: 173730, member: 8794"] Thanks everybody for your shared opinions. This has been indeed a productive continuation to the original discussion started in this thread, and it's good that no one has broken this great combo with personal attacks. After all, we're all here to learn and share knowledge. At this point, one thing still bothers me. I suspect this is a very important issue that has been largely overlooked here. It is the case for Virtual Machine tests in evaluating antivirus/antimalware solutions. If n.nvt and Littlebits are correct, VMs [I]do not[/I] represent real live machines well enough because the virtual system doesn't have the same level of access to the machine's resources, meaning the AV also doesn't have access to all the resources it needs to work properly. Is that correct? Because this would mean that so many users here doing VM tests are just doing little more than playing a type of video-game: it's cool to watch, but doesn't belong to real life. Another thing I would like n.nvt to clear up is the difference in trial vs. paid. Is the difference only the obvious time limit or is the protection level diminished as well? Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top