Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Anvi Smart Defender 2 Pro Test and Review
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 21043" data-source="post: 235067"><p>When you see another vendor with the same detection name for a threat as the other vendor and it looks a bit supicious, then you kind of look into it a bit. By looking at the facts, yes, I agree with [USER=21977]@Malware Test[/USER] and I also think that they are stealing, but at the end of the day, I also think it doesn't really matter too much. It's just a detection name, why care about it? Honestly... But yes, it looks like they are just taking it.</p><p></p><p>Actually, I would say it is and isn't our problem. It is our problem, because when you use a product, it's nice to know how it works, how it has it's detection it has, whether the detection is good or bad and so on. If it's good, you are then interested in how they even get such a good detection rate. Then again, it isn't our "business", I think is the word you were looking for, to do further investigation, considering Malwarebytes aren't stupid and would notice it anyway.</p><p></p><p>If Anvi were automatically stealing, as in connecting to the Malwarebytes private database via their application or even manually, OR, connecting to VirusTotal and fishing our the Malwarebytes signatures, then I would care and I think Malwarebytes would be too, but seen as it looks like they are manually going into VirusTotal and taking threat names, it would be fine on a legal matter anyway (as far as im concerned at least).</p><p></p><p>Thanks! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 21043, post: 235067"] When you see another vendor with the same detection name for a threat as the other vendor and it looks a bit supicious, then you kind of look into it a bit. By looking at the facts, yes, I agree with [USER=21977]@Malware Test[/USER] and I also think that they are stealing, but at the end of the day, I also think it doesn't really matter too much. It's just a detection name, why care about it? Honestly... But yes, it looks like they are just taking it. Actually, I would say it is and isn't our problem. It is our problem, because when you use a product, it's nice to know how it works, how it has it's detection it has, whether the detection is good or bad and so on. If it's good, you are then interested in how they even get such a good detection rate. Then again, it isn't our "business", I think is the word you were looking for, to do further investigation, considering Malwarebytes aren't stupid and would notice it anyway. If Anvi were automatically stealing, as in connecting to the Malwarebytes private database via their application or even manually, OR, connecting to VirusTotal and fishing our the Malwarebytes signatures, then I would care and I think Malwarebytes would be too, but seen as it looks like they are manually going into VirusTotal and taking threat names, it would be fine on a legal matter anyway (as far as im concerned at least). Thanks! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top