Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Any real-time software that uses non-traditional ways to find malware?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 915730" data-attributes="member: 62850"><p>This obviously can also happen with dynamic analysis if a necessary dependency cannot be located and the sample fails to execute and exhibit malicious behaviors. So if a malware engine returns a not detected verdict for a file that was unable to execute based on dynamic analysis, this poses a serious issue when the malware is executed in the real world and the dependency is available, and the malware executes. In other words, both static and dynamic analysis are important, for different reasons, especially when it comes to building training data sets.</p><p></p><p>WV did very well and no one expects for any malware detection to be perfect... it never will be. Just look at all of the variation in the results that people posted on this thread.</p><p></p><p>BTW, I have a REALLY interesting malware pack that I am going to look for and if I can find it, post it somewhere on MT. It is probably 3-4 years old as well, but the results would be extremely interesting for all tested products.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="danb, post: 915730, member: 62850"] This obviously can also happen with dynamic analysis if a necessary dependency cannot be located and the sample fails to execute and exhibit malicious behaviors. So if a malware engine returns a not detected verdict for a file that was unable to execute based on dynamic analysis, this poses a serious issue when the malware is executed in the real world and the dependency is available, and the malware executes. In other words, both static and dynamic analysis are important, for different reasons, especially when it comes to building training data sets. WV did very well and no one expects for any malware detection to be perfect... it never will be. Just look at all of the variation in the results that people posted on this thread. BTW, I have a REALLY interesting malware pack that I am going to look for and if I can find it, post it somewhere on MT. It is probably 3-4 years old as well, but the results would be extremely interesting for all tested products. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top