Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 715977" data-attributes="member: 32547">Good one [USER=60675]@Sunshine-boy[/USER].&nbsp; I forgot to mention Comodo HIPs but Comodo isn&#039;t going to be on this PC.&nbsp; It&#039;s on other ones here, but I want to test on this PC).C-HIPs is OK, but the alerts aren&#039;t specific enough for me.&nbsp; HIPs does what I would like, but the alerts just basically mention the HIPs classification rule of the protected setting that alerted program wants to change...not the specific element of the rule.&nbsp; Comodo sets the elements up in classifications.&nbsp; Also, it doesn&#039;t indicate the potential risk well...I haven&#039;t tried ESET (no key), but from what I have seen its alerts are much better than Comodo&#039;s.&nbsp; That goes for Kas, BD, Emsi, and others too (even Qihoo).&nbsp; I think maybe Emsi simiplified the GUI more than they should though.&nbsp; Maybe that makes some of the alerts kind of confusing.&nbsp; Did a little for me the few times I worked with Emsi...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 715977, member: 32547"] Good one [USER=60675]@Sunshine-boy[/USER]. I forgot to mention Comodo HIPs but Comodo isn't going to be on this PC. It's on other ones here, but I want to test on this PC). C-HIPs is OK, but the alerts aren't specific enough for me. HIPs does what I would like, but the alerts just basically mention the HIPs classification rule of the protected setting that alerted program wants to change...not the specific element of the rule. Comodo sets the elements up in classifications. Also, it doesn't indicate the potential risk well... I haven't tried ESET (no key), but from what I have seen its alerts are much better than Comodo's. That goes for Kas, BD, Emsi, and others too (even Qihoo). I think maybe Emsi simiplified the GUI more than they should though. Maybe that makes some of the alerts kind of confusing. Did a little for me the few times I worked with Emsi... [/QUOTE]

Verification