Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Prorootect" data-source="post: 686465" data-attributes="member: 905">Yes, more secure when it comes to privacy. They don&#039;t have the latest security patches - but they&#039;re much less spying.Good examples are Slimjet, or CENT Browser - look in the Settings .. you have many privacy settings under the hood ... then I have more confidence.Eg CENT has natively: Disable WebRTC, Prevent my local IP address from leaking by WebRTC, Disable HTLM5 canvas fingerprinting, Disable screenshots by extension API ..Then SLIMJET Block cross-domain HTTP referrer, Block social network javascript on third-party websites, Block Google ads on third-party websites, Replace indirect link in search engine results with direct link to original site .. &quot;Do Not Track&quot; requests&nbsp; too ..- The remaining ones are doing my extensions.So I use these Chromium forks, NOT Chrome. I don&#039;t want to hurt you, sorry and so on, ZeroDay!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Prorootect, post: 686465, member: 905"] Yes, more secure when it comes to [B]privacy[/B]. They don't have the latest security patches - but they're much less spying. Good examples are Slimjet, or CENT Browser - look in the Settings .. you have many privacy settings under the hood ... then I have [B]more confidence[/B]. Eg CENT has natively: Disable WebRTC, Prevent my local IP address from leaking by WebRTC, Disable HTLM5 canvas fingerprinting, Disable screenshots by extension API .. Then SLIMJET Block cross-domain HTTP referrer, Block social network javascript on third-party websites, Block Google ads on third-party websites, Replace indirect link in search engine results with direct link to original site .. "Do Not Track" requests too .. - The remaining ones are doing my extensions. So I use these Chromium forks, NOT Chrome. I don't want to hurt you, sorry and so on, ZeroDay! [/QUOTE]

Verification