Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 58943" data-source="post: 686514">1) Actually if you do some investigation, you might find some of these forks are less secured. Install them, then grab packet sniffers and get back to me on what you see. Of course I already know the answer because I have already done this. It&#039;s great one popular fork doesn&#039;t send telemetry to Google, but do you feel safer with all of the crap it sends to Quantcast?2) Can you guarantee integrity of systems those forks are compiled on? What if they are compromised?3) How about fast patching and exploit plugging, are they on top of that?4) Cent Browser, playing off the CentOS is cute. Do you know who they are? No, you probably don&#039;t because they don&#039;t disclose who they are. Just a random Gmail account. I&#039;ll tell you who they are; (you trust a shell holding company owned by the telemetry wing of Alibaba?)Nexperian Holding LimitedLe Jia International No.999 Liang Mu Road Yuhang DistrictHangzhou Zhejiang 311121 China5) Slimjet? From Flashpeak? So you trust a browser programmed by a Chinese Ex-Pat:<img src="https://s1.postimg.org/7y2m7go8mn/1383063_619519541434102_2084178622_n.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />&nbsp;from THIS location?<img src="https://s1.postimg.org/7nfsebgatr/flashpeak.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> 5) Since those command line switches work with most forks, you probably should STILL use them.6) WebRTC is nonsense, nobody cares about it, virtually everything blocks it. Even firewalls are adding SPI to block RTC local subnet disclosure by default.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 58943, post: 686514"] 1) Actually if you do some investigation, you might find some of these forks are less secured. Install them, then grab packet sniffers and get back to me on what you see. Of course I already know the answer because I have already done this. It's great one popular fork doesn't send telemetry to Google, but do you feel safer with all of the crap it sends to Quantcast? 2) Can you guarantee integrity of systems those forks are compiled on? What if they are compromised? 3) How about fast patching and exploit plugging, are they on top of that? 4) Cent Browser, playing off the CentOS is cute. Do you know who they are? No, you probably don't because they don't disclose who they are. Just a random Gmail account. I'll tell you who they are; (you trust a shell holding company owned by the telemetry wing of Alibaba?) Nexperian Holding Limited Le Jia International No.999 Liang Mu Road Yuhang District Hangzhou Zhejiang 311121 China 5) Slimjet? From Flashpeak? So you trust a browser programmed by a Chinese Ex-Pat: [IMG]https://s1.postimg.org/7y2m7go8mn/1383063_619519541434102_2084178622_n.jpg[/IMG] from THIS location? [IMG]https://s1.postimg.org/7nfsebgatr/flashpeak.png[/IMG] 5) Since those command line switches work with most forks, you probably should STILL use them. 6) WebRTC is nonsense, nobody cares about it, virtually everything blocks it. Even firewalls are adding SPI to block RTC local subnet disclosure by default. [/QUOTE]

Verification