Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MIDave" data-source="post: 975809" data-attributes="member: 68623">I have used AppGuard since version 4, and I generally like it. If I had to pay $90 per year, I would probably opt-out. I feel that it is a more comprehensive solution than SRP-based solutions given its memory guard and guarded application features. The downside is that the support of this &quot;consumer&quot; version is marginal at best. Also, I have observed some drag on performance at times when opening MS Office documents and other file explorer related tasks. I have also become a fan of Hard_Configurator, and I would like to learn more about some of the differences between these apps. Perhaps we could start a thread for that purpose.I hope this helps. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="MIDave, post: 975809, member: 68623"] I have used AppGuard since version 4, and I generally like it. If I had to pay $90 per year, I would probably opt-out. I feel that it is a more comprehensive solution than SRP-based solutions given its memory guard and guarded application features. The downside is that the support of this "consumer" version is marginal at best. Also, I have observed some drag on performance at times when opening MS Office documents and other file explorer related tasks. I have also become a fan of Hard_Configurator, and I would like to learn more about some of the differences between these apps. Perhaps we could start a thread for that purpose. I hope this helps. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification