Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 1109618" data-attributes="member: 62850">Yes, that is my understanding as well.&nbsp; But in doing so, this would not be an apples for apples AppGuard VS CyberLock test.&nbsp; In short, offering tons of usability features, like the ability to allow a blocked item in real-time is a good thing, not a bad thing.&nbsp; Hell, in DefenderUI Pro and WDAC Lockdown, we even added a feature to allow native WDAC blocks <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.&nbsp; Even some people from Microsoft &quot;Loved&quot; this feature.Locking down the system and blocking everything is the easy part.&nbsp; Making your lockdown app user-friendly is the difficult part.And yes, you are correct, there are tons of different ways you can adjust easily the settings in CyberLock so that the user does not inadvertently allow something malicious.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="danb, post: 1109618, member: 62850"] Yes, that is my understanding as well. But in doing so, this would not be an apples for apples AppGuard VS CyberLock test. In short, offering tons of usability features, like the ability to allow a blocked item in real-time is a good thing, not a bad thing. Hell, in DefenderUI Pro and WDAC Lockdown, we even added a feature to allow native WDAC blocks ;). Even some people from Microsoft "Loved" this feature. Locking down the system and blocking everything is the easy part. Making your lockdown app user-friendly is the difficult part. And yes, you are correct, there are tons of different ways you can adjust easily the settings in CyberLock so that the user does not inadvertently allow something malicious. [/QUOTE]

Verification