Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CyberDevil" data-source="post: 1084313" data-attributes="member: 91290">Interesting observations:- Trend Micro has recognized that attempting to detect everything can be counterproductive and has attempted to revise its protection strategy. There aren&#039;t a million false positives anymore. However, its effectiveness was previously reliant on everything detection =)- Avira appears to be engaged in extensive signature exchange with Avast, leading to speculation that they may eventually merge into a single engine. I await further developments on this front.- G Data continues to perform exceptionally in offline detection, leveraging Bitdefender&#039;s robust engine alongside its own comprehensive technology.- F-Secure has demonstrated impressive protection level, leveraging a vast database comprising Avast and Avira signatures, coupled with one of the most advanced behavioral analyzers developed in-house.- TotalAV&#039;s surprising second-place ranking is noteworthy, given its reliance solely on Avira technology without cloud support or proprietary technologies. Its efficiency in protection, driven by the Avast + Avira engine, underscores this engine clear effectiveness.- Total Defense, built upon Bitdefender technology, has unexpectedly outperformed its parent company. Its success raises questions about its proprietary technologies. Has anyone conducted tests on Total Defense on MalwareTips? oO- Kaspersky and Bitdefender are facing challenges from the formidable alliance of Norton, Avast, and Avira. However, Bitdefender stands out against this background by the fact that it is completely independent of the network in the stability of protection. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that even in 2024, Bitdefender lacks cloud technologys, judging by the same level of online and offline protection.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CyberDevil, post: 1084313, member: 91290"] Interesting observations: - Trend Micro has recognized that attempting to detect everything can be counterproductive and has attempted to revise its protection strategy. There aren't a million false positives anymore. However, its effectiveness was previously reliant on everything detection =) - Avira appears to be engaged in extensive signature exchange with Avast, leading to speculation that they may eventually merge into a single engine. I await further developments on this front. - G Data continues to perform exceptionally in offline detection, leveraging Bitdefender's robust engine alongside its own comprehensive technology. - F-Secure has demonstrated impressive protection level, leveraging a vast database comprising Avast and Avira signatures, coupled with one of the most advanced behavioral analyzers developed in-house. - TotalAV's surprising second-place ranking is noteworthy, given its reliance solely on Avira technology without cloud support or proprietary technologies. Its efficiency in protection, driven by the Avast + Avira engine, underscores this engine clear effectiveness. - Total Defense, built upon Bitdefender technology, has unexpectedly outperformed its parent company. Its success raises questions about its proprietary technologies. Has anyone conducted tests on Total Defense on MalwareTips? oO - Kaspersky and Bitdefender are facing challenges from the formidable alliance of Norton, Avast, and Avira. However, Bitdefender stands out against this background by the fact that it is completely independent of the network in the stability of protection. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that even in 2024, Bitdefender lacks cloud technologys, judging by the same level of online and offline protection. [/QUOTE]

Verification