Av-comparatives Real-World Protection Test March 2016
- Thread starter luoye
- Start date
- Sep 26, 2014
- 2,973
I think that AVG has improved a lot lately, very good protection score with zero false positives.
But from this chart i can see that all products offer good protection, even Defender which is last it's score is more than 95%
But from this chart i can see that all products offer good protection, even Defender which is last it's score is more than 95%
- Aug 23, 2013
- 1,076
- Dec 21, 2014
- 16
I do not know why it was closed ,but you can see the report at the follow websit
File Detection Test - AV-Comparatives
http://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/avc_fdt_201603_en.pdf
- May 30, 2013
- 125
Maybe I'll have to give AVG another try. BTW is that the free version?
- Jul 14, 2015
- 776
Great result again for Avira , AVG improved a lot (tested internet security) @Slowpoke73 but the free version should be at the same level.
- Aug 30, 2015
- 1,928
Avira - Really improving, I am impressed @Avira!
Bitdefender - Not surprised
F-Secure - Like Avira, it is really improving keep it up @F-Secure!
Trend Micro - Never really used it :/
AVG - Good signatures, 0 false positives
eScan - Never really used it :/
Vipre - Never really used it :/
ESET - Expected better for what it is, but well-done @ESET!
Emsisoft - Amazing as usual
Kaspersky - Really was expecting better for Kaspersky
Tencent - Never really used it :/
Avast! - Really expected better with its 'Streaming Updates' and other features...
Bullguard - Never really used it :/
Lavasoft - Never really used it :/
Fortinet - Never really used it :/
Quick Heal - Never really used it :/
Sophos - Commercial-grade, i was expecting it in the top 5...
McAfee - Not happy.
Microsoft - With it's cloud and machine learning, come on!
Bitdefender - Not surprised
F-Secure - Like Avira, it is really improving keep it up @F-Secure!
Trend Micro - Never really used it :/
AVG - Good signatures, 0 false positives
eScan - Never really used it :/
Vipre - Never really used it :/
ESET - Expected better for what it is, but well-done @ESET!
Emsisoft - Amazing as usual
Kaspersky - Really was expecting better for Kaspersky
Tencent - Never really used it :/
Avast! - Really expected better with its 'Streaming Updates' and other features...
Bullguard - Never really used it :/
Lavasoft - Never really used it :/
Fortinet - Never really used it :/
Quick Heal - Never really used it :/
Sophos - Commercial-grade, i was expecting it in the top 5...
McAfee - Not happy.
Microsoft - With it's cloud and machine learning, come on!
Look ! -- Kaspersky fell in ranking for this round of tests !
Good Lord... you better consider switching to something else.
Avira... yeah - that's the ticket.
Good Lord... you better consider switching to something else.
Avira... yeah - that's the ticket.
Wonder why webroot or Qihoo is still not in these tests? Tencent looks good but alot of these malware programs hate that av for some reason.
Webroot doesn't participate because their rank is has always been inconsistent - sometimes towards the top, sometimes towards the bottom.
Webroot only participates in AV lab tests that will rank it high.
Webroot says "No one understands how Webroot SecureAnywhere works" and AV lab testing is "inapplicable because of the way WSA works."
Users report potential security holes and they never get fixed. Webroot thinks in "real-world scenarios" these security holes are extremely unlikely.
For example, execute malicious script that deletes entire drive with Webroot installed and see what happens...
I did not want to know that I am using webroot right now ...lol
- Mar 19, 2015
- 217
I don't believe these tests no more. I don't believe that Avira is 100% its just not real. from all tests been done hear ESET is better than Avira further more even MSE is better.
the problem with Avira also is we need to get the pro version or better to be secured while browsing ,etc
- Feb 4, 2016
- 549
In these tests it is a grain of salt ... but it's amazing how Bitdefender always sends well, I do not follow all the results of these tests, but whenever I see Bitdefender always sends well!
I expected more from ESET, anyway is a good result.
I'm a little surprised with the result of Kaspersky, I expected more.
I expected more from ESET, anyway is a good result.
I'm a little surprised with the result of Kaspersky, I expected more.
All you have to do is NVT ERP or VooDooShield and system will have good protection.
That Webroot doesn't fix script vulnerability is no problem; just add anti-executable that will protect against scripts.
- Jun 21, 2014
- 107
NEW TEST: "File Detection Test - March 2016".
Kasperky is better.
http://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/avc_fdt_201603_en.pdf
It's the face of stupidity to compare AVs in this way.
Execute malwares that they do not detect and you will see that in a significant portion of cases the AV cannot protect the system.
It's a joke.
All that should matter is if an AV can protect the system if a user executes an undetected malware.
That's it. That should be the measure of protection.
Execute malwares that they do not detect and you will see that in a significant portion of cases the AV cannot protect the system.
It's a joke.
All that should matter is if an AV can protect the system if a user executes an undetected malware.
That's it. That should be the measure of protection.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Apr 28, 2015
- 8,916
Certainly this month Kaspersky fell down in detection, it usually gets the great results in this test, anyway 99.1% is good enough... let's wait the results in next test
Visit MalWare Hub section in this forum, almost everyday We check dynamically unknown samples against some Security products
Visit MalWare Hub section in this forum, almost everyday We check dynamically unknown samples against some Security products
- Apr 5, 2014
- 6,008
Similar threads
