Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
AV-Test Windows 10 Home User - April 2019
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 817109"><p>I agree wholeheartedly. </p><p></p><p>This result on performance mimics my overall experience using WD. i don't install and uninstall programs on a daily basis and I think it would be safe to assume that the vast majority of people (including techies) don't do this on a daily basis either. To be brutally honest, I've never really timed how long it takes to install a program using WD, it still seems to happen fast enough for me anyways. What I mean is, if I took the time to time it and compare it to another product and if I find that it take 10 more seconds (for example) than the other product, is 10 seconds more really that bad?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It be very honest, it's getting harder and harder to justify 3rd party AV/suites anymore. Not saying WD meets everyone's needs, nor am I saying it's perfect, but when you take the overall (significantly improved) protection, it's fairly good performance, the built in/free price, along with no annoyances/ads, it's really hard to beat. I have fully switched to WD, with OSA and will be adding [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER]'s new firewall app, I don't think I can do better in all honesty. I mean what would I gain from going with a 3rd party, a few seconds faster installing a program, a task I don't do often?<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 817109"] I agree wholeheartedly. This result on performance mimics my overall experience using WD. i don't install and uninstall programs on a daily basis and I think it would be safe to assume that the vast majority of people (including techies) don't do this on a daily basis either. To be brutally honest, I've never really timed how long it takes to install a program using WD, it still seems to happen fast enough for me anyways. What I mean is, if I took the time to time it and compare it to another product and if I find that it take 10 more seconds (for example) than the other product, is 10 seconds more really that bad? It be very honest, it's getting harder and harder to justify 3rd party AV/suites anymore. Not saying WD meets everyone's needs, nor am I saying it's perfect, but when you take the overall (significantly improved) protection, it's fairly good performance, the built in/free price, along with no annoyances/ads, it's really hard to beat. I have fully switched to WD, with OSA and will be adding [USER=32260]@Andy Ful[/USER]'s new firewall app, I don't think I can do better in all honesty. I mean what would I gain from going with a 3rd party, a few seconds faster installing a program, a task I don't do often?;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top