Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
AV with the lowest disk usage during normal operation (idle and real-time protection)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SpiderWeb" data-source="post: 1094821" data-attributes="member: 88686"><p>It's very hard to tell since most AVs operate on the driver level but that also means those events are minimal. AVs rarely act independently from the system. Whatever the system reads, the AV reads in the same process if that makes sense. Imagine the OS as a person, the AV is sitting on his shoulder seeing the same thing he's seeing simultaneously The AV doesn't have to read it twice. This piggybacking creates more work for CPU and requires more RAM, but it's not creating more reads. The only time AVs do create separate read events is during scheduled or more in depth scans of new or compressed files you access. But, these also come with the benefit of indirectly data scrubbing. Basically you want to regularly read every sector on an SSD to recharge the cells and prevent bit rot.</p><p></p><p>To directly answer your question, no direct test exists other than performance comparisons which might correlate to disk usage affecting overall system responsiveness.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SpiderWeb, post: 1094821, member: 88686"] It's very hard to tell since most AVs operate on the driver level but that also means those events are minimal. AVs rarely act independently from the system. Whatever the system reads, the AV reads in the same process if that makes sense. Imagine the OS as a person, the AV is sitting on his shoulder seeing the same thing he's seeing simultaneously The AV doesn't have to read it twice. This piggybacking creates more work for CPU and requires more RAM, but it's not creating more reads. The only time AVs do create separate read events is during scheduled or more in depth scans of new or compressed files you access. But, these also come with the benefit of indirectly data scrubbing. Basically you want to regularly read every sector on an SSD to recharge the cells and prevent bit rot. To directly answer your question, no direct test exists other than performance comparisons which might correlate to disk usage affecting overall system responsiveness. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top