- Aug 30, 2015
- 1,928
Hey so what do you guys think of Baidu? My friend and I hadn't really heard of Baidu and both being Avast users were unsure about how it would be against it. An explanation of why one is better than the other is welcome.
Neither. Why choose Baidu over the superior Qihoo 360 Total Secrurity Essentials?Hey so what do you guys think of Baidu? My friend and I hadn't really heard of Baidu and both being Avast users were unsure about how it would be against it. An explanation of why one is better than the other is welcome.
Not true. QIhoo/Baidu does detects international malware. We can say the same that Kaspersky is focused on Russian malware. I am speaking about QIhoo here. Qihoo have been shown to excel in zero day test by cruelsister when free and paid western antivirus fails (avast, kaspersky, mcafee)Well, Avast does not need much explanation, currently I use it in HM on aggressive with a complete protection.
About Baidu, I believe that China has the world record of infected PCs and Baidu, as the other major chinese vendors, with their security products, are mainly focused on chinese malware.
I don't want to say that Baidu is not also valid for the western market and it uses Baidu Antivirus Engine and Baidu Cloud Engine integrated with Avira but it, like others chinese vendors, is primarily born for the chinese market, which is notoriously closed to the western world.
Have been using a chinese antivirus for close to 2 years and have not experience any such stuff. No increase in spam or unwanted transaction.My advise : why fix something that is not broken? avast is top notch and does not impact your system! baidu is also very light on resources but it is not develloped anymore , furthermore I do firmly believe that just with every other chinese pc products ( maintainance and security ) a hefty amount of tracking / spying software is installed along with it , not vissable for the naked eye.
Fancy marketing terms. Period. Avast always comes up with fancy marketing terms that are half-baked for like what 2-3 years?I would agree with all the users here, Avast has served me well for a very long time and I think that changing to Baidu is actually a set downwards seeing that they haven't updated their program in such a long time, their latest version is still 2015 and if you take a look at their awards tab, you'll notice that the awards stated are mostly from 2014 and early 2015. They have not been in a independent test in a long time.
Personally I feel that most of their detections are also based off Avira signatures, so why go to Baidu for their signatures when you can just use Avira itself.
Also Baidu is a lot less robust in terms of features compared to Avast, with Avast's new CyberCapture and their hardened mode.
Neither. Why choose Baidu over the superior Qihoo 360 Total Secrurity Essentials?
1) Kaspersky is not a chinese anti-virus and we can not make comparisons, if you read well what I wrote, I am not saying that Baidu is not suitable for the western market, but originally it is designed for the chinese market, and this is a fact, whether you agree or not.Not true. QIhoo/Baidu does detects international malware. We can say the same that Kaspersky is focused on Russian malware. I am speaking about QIhoo here. Qihoo have been shown to excel in zero day test by cruelsister when free and paid western antivirus fails (avast, kaspersky, mcafee)
Are you serious? 360 has great zero day protection, didn't Cruelsister show this. Plus it's seen on many other reviews.Baidu should not be used. AT ALL. They are an atrocious company with a spyware-like privacy policy, and their protection is one of the worst in the industry. They have an amazing UI, but that's literally it.
Avast has it's own share of privacy problems, but they are much more reputable as they have been around for quite a while. Their protection is one of the best in the industry with Hardened Mode on, and you can cut down on bloat by disabling modules contrary to other suites.
360 Total Security is not needed; they piggyback off other engines, but they most likely only license the antivirus signatures, meaning they have minimal 0-day defenses in place. Using multiple, almost identical engines also means that they are extremely resource-intensive while giving little to no additional security benefit in the name of "buzzwords" and "marketing". Their in-house engines suck anywhere outside of china, and they too have a heinous privacy policy and an awful track record.