Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Other Browsers
Avoid These Browsers
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lenny_Fox" data-source="post: 939170" data-attributes="member: 82776"><p>Ture</p><p></p><p>Not entirely correct</p><p>Advertisements are also content made out of scripts, media and content. Scripts, images, text, etcetera are all data somewhere located on a server in the cloud. A DNS can interfere with websitecontent by not resolving references to content located in the cinternet. When an embedded ink to a youtube movie is not resolved, the content won't play.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Partly true</p><p>For third-party trackers using canonical name cloaking a DNS is the best place to block these type of trackers. For advanced (affiliae) tracking and tagging a DNS does not look into the content like adblockers do. An adblocker like uBlock or Adguard can look simantically into the content. A DNS can only resolve (allow) or block an external link. This makes them also the best place for malware blocking </p><p></p><p>Try enabling the Next_DNS blocklist or AdGuard DNS blocklist without allowing "Affiliate and Trackinglinks" in Next_DNS and Next DNS will block most links you click on in the Google result page (because they are stuffed with tracking and tagging). g (and of course canonical name misuse). This little field test shows that DNS is not the best place to block, redirect or hide advertisements and tracking systems.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lenny_Fox, post: 939170, member: 82776"] Ture Not entirely correct Advertisements are also content made out of scripts, media and content. Scripts, images, text, etcetera are all data somewhere located on a server in the cloud. A DNS can interfere with websitecontent by not resolving references to content located in the cinternet. When an embedded ink to a youtube movie is not resolved, the content won't play. Partly true For third-party trackers using canonical name cloaking a DNS is the best place to block these type of trackers. For advanced (affiliae) tracking and tagging a DNS does not look into the content like adblockers do. An adblocker like uBlock or Adguard can look simantically into the content. A DNS can only resolve (allow) or block an external link. This makes them also the best place for malware blocking Try enabling the Next_DNS blocklist or AdGuard DNS blocklist without allowing "Affiliate and Trackinglinks" in Next_DNS and Next DNS will block most links you click on in the Google result page (because they are stuffed with tracking and tagging). g (and of course canonical name misuse). This little field test shows that DNS is not the best place to block, redirect or hide advertisements and tracking systems. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
