Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 819665">Hehe I agree<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I think you see similarities, because the same applies to SHP as it does to Eset here. SHP like all products isn&#039;t perfect, it has it weakness too (scripting malware), but because it doesn&#039;t get &quot;perfect&quot; well it &quot;sucks.&quot;&nbsp; Whats funny to me at least, is that some are quick to point out it&#039;s weakness against scripting malware (which is true), but some fail&nbsp; to acknowledge that a lot of vendors struggle with scripting malware, even if they have things like BB&#039;s. If [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER]&#039;s videos are anything to go by, you&#039;d see that she would essentially rip apart any product, despite their claims of having x technology to solve all your problems.Your example is exactly what people should be doing IMO. It&#039;s not always about how well is scores in a test, but should be about how the product works for you and meets your needs. There&#039;s more to a product than trying to get 99-100% on a test.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />I agree wholeheartedly!This is the one point that is often forgotten when it comes to security programs. It&#039;s fine and all to test and try out different products, we&#039;re all geeks here, so testing is in our blood, but there&#039;s no magic solution that will protect you 100% every time. Every product, even a setup like default deny can fail if you don&#039;t practice safe habits, or become too over confident in whats going on. I&#039;m not suggesting that anyone lives in fear, but rather just practice safe habits.As I&#039;ve said before I am not a fan of when people recommend a product as a way to compensate for someone practicing unsafe habits. Sure x product may be a little better, but if you aren&#039;t teaching them any proper habits, at some point they will become infected, even with your security product recommendation.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 819665"] Hehe I agree:) I think you see similarities, because the same applies to SHP as it does to Eset here. SHP like all products isn't perfect, it has it weakness too (scripting malware), but because it doesn't get "perfect" well it "sucks." Whats funny to me at least, is that some are quick to point out it's weakness against scripting malware (which is true), but some fail to acknowledge that a lot of vendors struggle with scripting malware, even if they have things like BB's. If [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER]'s videos are anything to go by, you'd see that she would essentially rip apart any product, despite their claims of having x technology to solve all your problems. Your example is exactly what people should be doing IMO. It's not always about how well is scores in a test, but should be about how the product works for you and meets your needs. There's more to a product than trying to get 99-100% on a test.;)(y) I agree wholeheartedly! This is the one point that is often forgotten when it comes to security programs. It's fine and all to test and try out different products, we're all geeks here, so testing is in our blood, but there's no magic solution that will protect you 100% every time. Every product, even a setup like default deny can fail if you don't practice safe habits, or become too over confident in whats going on. I'm not suggesting that anyone lives in fear, but rather just practice safe habits. As I've said before I am not a fan of when people recommend a product as a way to compensate for someone practicing unsafe habits. Sure x product may be a little better, but if you aren't teaching them any proper habits, at some point they will become infected, even with your security product recommendation.;) [/QUOTE]

Verification