Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Battlefield
Software Comparison
Best antivirus solution for Windows 11
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bumblebee Uncle" data-source="post: 1017113" data-attributes="member: 94584"><p>This is not how BB's are tested. They might be tested like this in isolation (in a sandbox for instance) during development. But, turning a component/module off to test an AV is an archaic strategy for AV's where all modules are layered and intertwined. For a layered AV, if one component doesn't detect something, then the next component/module picks up on it. </p><p></p><p>So, seeing a test on YT and using that as a reference is a bit flawed. My two cents on this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bumblebee Uncle, post: 1017113, member: 94584"] This is not how BB's are tested. They might be tested like this in isolation (in a sandbox for instance) during development. But, turning a component/module off to test an AV is an archaic strategy for AV's where all modules are layered and intertwined. For a layered AV, if one component doesn't detect something, then the next component/module picks up on it. So, seeing a test on YT and using that as a reference is a bit flawed. My two cents on this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
