Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1121036" data-attributes="member: 121355">Obviously, because it&#039;s the same family today.But I don&#039;t believe that Norton is good at behavioral protection, since recently it&#039;s not only been getting hammered in tests here or on the web (for example Youtube) by BD or Kaspersky but even by Eset, where Eset has opinions on this forum that it has poor behavioral protection. So either Norton is overpriced or Eset is underrated.I don&#039;t know the opinions about Gdata, for example, how it does in behavioral protection.I was heading in this topic to finally get to the point, where discussions continue in many topics. Which ones are very good in behavioral protection, which ones are good and which ones are average. Anyone who enters this topic will have black and white which AV is in which group when it comes to behavioral protectionIn my opinion, Kaspersky, Bitdefender and Eset have been the best AVs for years. Of course, they had their ups and downs (Kaspersky the least) but whenever you think of AVs, these three always come to mind first.&nbsp; But that&#039;s just my opinion.It&#039;s not about what I want to choose. It&#039;s about simplifying the choice for everyone. Some people here sleep on the forum <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite116" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> and live it, so they probably have the knowledge where they can reveal which AVs in behavioral protection are even worth considering.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1121036, member: 121355"] Obviously, because it's the same family today. But I don't believe that Norton is good at behavioral protection, since recently it's not only been getting hammered in tests here or on the web (for example Youtube) by BD or Kaspersky but even by Eset, where Eset has opinions on this forum that it has poor behavioral protection. So either Norton is overpriced or Eset is underrated. I don't know the opinions about Gdata, for example, how it does in behavioral protection. I was heading in this topic to finally get to the point, where discussions continue in many topics. Which ones are very good in behavioral protection, which ones are good and which ones are average. Anyone who enters this topic will have black and white which AV is in which group when it comes to behavioral protection In my opinion, Kaspersky, Bitdefender and Eset have been the best AVs for years. Of course, they had their ups and downs (Kaspersky the least) but whenever you think of AVs, these three always come to mind first. But that's just my opinion. It's not about what I want to choose. It's about simplifying the choice for everyone. Some people here sleep on the forum :D and live it, so they probably have the knowledge where they can reveal which AVs in behavioral protection are even worth considering. [/QUOTE]

Verification