Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Bitdefender Antivirus Free [v1.0.14.76] vs Project57 ransomware
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 787770"><p>Its good to have layers, provided they don't overlap one another. I too use a combination of layers <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>One thing that came to me after my last post, is in regards to YouTube tests, or "tests" in general. Based on the testing methodology I mentioned above, my question is why are people still testing in this manner? I get it, people want to test different components on the program, but when I see comments like, we'll this products signatures are garbage, but it's bb, or what ever else stopped it, who cares? I mean does it really matter what component stopped the malware? I would be grateful if it stopped it, I don't actually care how it did it. Similarly, having different security layers, I don't care which layer stopped the malware. If something got past WD, but was stopped by VS, or OSA instead, again who cares? All that matters is that the malware was stopped. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 787770"] Its good to have layers, provided they don't overlap one another. I too use a combination of layers :) One thing that came to me after my last post, is in regards to YouTube tests, or "tests" in general. Based on the testing methodology I mentioned above, my question is why are people still testing in this manner? I get it, people want to test different components on the program, but when I see comments like, we'll this products signatures are garbage, but it's bb, or what ever else stopped it, who cares? I mean does it really matter what component stopped the malware? I would be grateful if it stopped it, I don't actually care how it did it. Similarly, having different security layers, I don't care which layer stopped the malware. If something got past WD, but was stopped by VS, or OSA instead, again who cares? All that matters is that the malware was stopped. (y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top