Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 806799">That was the previous version of SHP, which didn&#039;t fair too well, but the newer 2.0 has improved quite a bit. That being said, nothing is perfect and any product can miss things. From my understanding the Hub was never designed/ment to put products against each other, nor was it meant for people to base their decisions on. I beilieve it was meant to simply test and report findings/issues to the various vendors, but maybe someone who has been here for a while can elaborate on this. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />That being said, intercept X is a very different product from SHP. While they share similar tech, intercept x is their enterprise offering and can be ran along an AV if I&#039;m not mistaken, but I may be wrong. It has HMPA tech along with other in-house tech that they have come up with. I think they are 2 different products, Bitdefender and Intercept x. I haven&#039;t used Bitdefender in a while, everytime I did I always has significant performance issues and random bug that I&#039;m not sure if they fixed, but I would still try it out for yourself and see. Personally if your happy with Bitdefender and HMPA, I would just stick with that. Bitdefender alone is very good protection wise also. However, if you have access to intercept x,, it may worth giving it a try also. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 806799"] That was the previous version of SHP, which didn't fair too well, but the newer 2.0 has improved quite a bit. That being said, nothing is perfect and any product can miss things. From my understanding the Hub was never designed/ment to put products against each other, nor was it meant for people to base their decisions on. I beilieve it was meant to simply test and report findings/issues to the various vendors, but maybe someone who has been here for a while can elaborate on this. :) That being said, intercept X is a very different product from SHP. While they share similar tech, intercept x is their enterprise offering and can be ran along an AV if I'm not mistaken, but I may be wrong. It has HMPA tech along with other in-house tech that they have come up with. I think they are 2 different products, Bitdefender and Intercept x. I haven't used Bitdefender in a while, everytime I did I always has significant performance issues and random bug that I'm not sure if they fixed, but I would still try it out for yourself and see. Personally if your happy with Bitdefender and HMPA, I would just stick with that. Bitdefender alone is very good protection wise also. However, if you have access to intercept x,, it may worth giving it a try also. :)(y) [/QUOTE]

Verification