Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Bitdefender vs Kaspersky | Best Free Antivirus?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cruelsister" data-source="post: 749298" data-attributes="member: 7463"><p>When I was doing videos I never wanted to comment on those done by others. However I am finally Free At Last.</p><p></p><p>This video has to be one of the most pathetic that I've viewed:</p><p></p><p>1). Notice the author did not really have a good deal of knowledge about either K or BD.</p><p>2). Notice the comment that the malware used could be between "Zero-Day" and 1 week old? Notice also that assuming there was actually new malware in the packs used they were collected around 11 July and the test was done with updated signatures on 14 July?</p><p>3). The author highlighted the JS script file. Anyone notice that not only did it not work, but it was also from 2008? This wasn't ever Zero-Decade.</p><p>4). Notice the file sizes? See any duplicates (I bet you can)?</p><p>5). Are any of these files actually malware? When a Security video is done. the author MUST be familiar with the malware used in addition to the product tested! This sloppiness shown here just takes my breath away...</p><p>6). The author has the God-Dammed Gall to state that he spent a lot of time making the video- I'm not even going to comment further on this.</p><p>7). But the saddest thing is that for a newly released video it already has a few thousand view and about 500 likes. </p><p></p><p>KMN</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cruelsister, post: 749298, member: 7463"] When I was doing videos I never wanted to comment on those done by others. However I am finally Free At Last. This video has to be one of the most pathetic that I've viewed: 1). Notice the author did not really have a good deal of knowledge about either K or BD. 2). Notice the comment that the malware used could be between "Zero-Day" and 1 week old? Notice also that assuming there was actually new malware in the packs used they were collected around 11 July and the test was done with updated signatures on 14 July? 3). The author highlighted the JS script file. Anyone notice that not only did it not work, but it was also from 2008? This wasn't ever Zero-Decade. 4). Notice the file sizes? See any duplicates (I bet you can)? 5). Are any of these files actually malware? When a Security video is done. the author MUST be familiar with the malware used in addition to the product tested! This sloppiness shown here just takes my breath away... 6). The author has the God-Dammed Gall to state that he spent a lot of time making the video- I'm not even going to comment further on this. 7). But the saddest thing is that for a newly released video it already has a few thousand view and about 500 likes. KMN [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top