- Jan 15, 2015
- 11
My current pc specs and security setup.
looks good thanks for sharing your config
Looks perfect to me thanks for sharing!
Did you find much difference between the 3 modes of security in 360? Performance/Balanced/Security? Also how is your opinion on the Speed up and cleaning utilities?
Was about to ask why you chose Total Security over Internet Security but I assume its because of the virus databases?
Thanks for sharing the config.
Very good configuration!
Any backups and recovery that you have in case of any emergency arises?
Looks good as is, so I couldn't recommend anything else to add.
Thanks for sharing.
It seems you have, and shall continue to receive, the highest marks for many excellent choices in both software and execution; and I thank you for sharing your knowing set up with us. Btw, I love that you have lots of RAM, & thoroughly endorse CCleaner! I shall look further into each software you've listed following it! As you are familiar with Hitman Pro, surfright has additionally developed a program I have recently installed on our own Windows 7 SP1 & 8.1 systems. It's called HitmanPro.Alert 2.6. You can read more about it, and download it here:
Bravo20, I just have to ask, ..you aren't by any chance related to our very own exterminator20, are you?? You see, you both have the very same last name (20)!! Although I jest (I am really j/k,) it isn't too far fetched for you each share being quite knowledgeable.
Thanks!
(This was my PM to you, but then I realized it's fun to share with everyone, most of the time, too!)Indeed, I tested HitmanPro.Alert 3.0.22 build 131 Release Candidate not too long ago. It certainly seems a lot further down the line in terms of capability than Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit, but I'm not sure I'd ever consider purchasing a license and ditching MBAE as I just don't feel it's necessary. I might be missing something, but I can't see that HMPA offers anything extra to the free sandboxed browsing and keylogger blocking that I already have in place. The question should always be, why pay? Particularly when one is a hard-up student!
No, no relations here, as far as I am aware... Then again, I guess we're all kind of related through our geeky love for malware-busting
(This was my PM to you, but then I realized it's fun to share with everyone, most of the time, too!)
Hello Bravo20,
I agree completely, if the question is "why pay?". I've been humbly grateful to both generous fellow members and (yes) staff, as well as those gloriously exciting Free Giveaways you'd mentioned on your intro. I have been saved from the costs of AVs & software (for now) *crosses fingers* while looking Heavenward.
I'm glad to hear you sandbox as I'd nearly recommended Sandboxie but held back as well as suggesting activating Chrome's 3rd party cookie blocker. In case you don't already know, here it is:
- From Settings scroll to the bottom >> Show Advanced settings...
- Under Privacy choose >> Content Settings... >> Cookies >> mark box "Block third party cookies & site data"
- Also choose "Keep local data only until you quit browser"
Malwarebytes Anti-exploit is also part of my arsenal, and yet I've wondered whether it essentially covers vulnerabilities equally, though they read differently.
- Optional for added privacy: Browse using "Incognito"
MBAM Anti-exploit = Zero day (protecting browsers & Java)
while Hitman pro.Alert = Warning of unsafe sites & stopping Banking Trojans/Anti-crytolocker (like a UAC that wouldn't be thought annoying..)
One attraction of HitmanPro.Alert 2.6 is it's protection from ransomware, and another is that it's a free software too.
Regards from your new friend & fellow member,
~Cats
PS *laughing* as our cat (the 1 on the left) is sleeping as in the picture, but now he's behind the computer & U-turned the other way around!
Thanks, some good suggestions there. I've been meaning to check out LastPass, looks like a useful bit of kit.
You make a good point about both anti-exploiters. We'd like to think Malwarebytes would be on top of most ransomware etc., but they are definitely a lot more vague than Surfright about what they are actually guarding users from and how they achieve it. They should probably look into this aspect in future versions of the product, but I guess I've settled upon them (MBAE free) because HMPA 2.6 has primarily been advertised as "alert" rather than prevention software.
Ultimately, I think one can get too carried away with trying to cover all bases and overcomplicating their setup by running numerous applications that eventually bog the PC down and create conflicts etc. As I said, finding a balance between reliable signatures and zero-day defence, like sandboxing/behaviour-blocking, and combining it with some good old fashioned common sense, is usually more than adequate.
By the way, you mentioned Google, who I have also been quite impressed with of late. Have you noticed how good GMail has become at identifying spam and disabling malicious content? I reckon this is due to their acquisition of Virus Total, but it's certainly very good to see as many people are still clueless about online dangers and simply open and execute everything without thinking. Maybe this increase in warnings within people's inboxes will move them to become better informed about internet security and even stumble upon MT! I hope so.