Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Software Troubleshooting
Build Security around ReHIPS 2.3 on a System?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 701230" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Thanks very much [USER=37647]@shmu26[/USER]. The details for expert mode are fantastic. This gives me a great place to start.</p><p></p><p>I was whitelisting vulnerables on 2.2 as things turn out. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite125" alt=":LOL:" title="Laugh :LOL:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":LOL:" /> Luckily I had NVT ERP running too because I really wasn't sure I knew what I was doing with ReHIPS.</p><p></p><p>Going over the list of Unbound, I notice the "vulnerables" there, and I see how the rules are generally set to "Inspect Children". That helps with the parent/child explaination on things. The protections seem to be here, but I can see why you pushed to have the choice for whitelisting a single command line handled in a more obvious way. True, it can become routine with use, but someone could start off on the wrong foot.</p><p></p><p>The more I look this over, the more I am liking NVT ERP, ironically. I have about 100 or so vulnerables in ERP, and I am gaining a new respect for using it with this set of them in place. Not to take away from ReHIPS o/c, but it is interesting having both on the same machine. I'll probably keep the setup for awhile to make some comparisons.</p><p></p><p>Really appreciate your always reliable help and also [USER=30916]@SHvFl[/USER]...<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 701230, member: 32547"] Thanks very much [USER=37647]@shmu26[/USER]. The details for expert mode are fantastic. This gives me a great place to start. I was whitelisting vulnerables on 2.2 as things turn out. :LOL: Luckily I had NVT ERP running too because I really wasn't sure I knew what I was doing with ReHIPS. Going over the list of Unbound, I notice the "vulnerables" there, and I see how the rules are generally set to "Inspect Children". That helps with the parent/child explaination on things. The protections seem to be here, but I can see why you pushed to have the choice for whitelisting a single command line handled in a more obvious way. True, it can become routine with use, but someone could start off on the wrong foot. The more I look this over, the more I am liking NVT ERP, ironically. I have about 100 or so vulnerables in ERP, and I am gaining a new respect for using it with this set of them in place. Not to take away from ReHIPS o/c, but it is interesting having both on the same machine. I'll probably keep the setup for awhile to make some comparisons. Really appreciate your always reliable help and also [USER=30916]@SHvFl[/USER]...:) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top