Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 919341" data-attributes="member: 32260">I think that the setup was adjusted to the test scenario which does not include targeted attacks. The samples were gathered just like in the consumer tests (Home user scenario) and only the AV settings were applied in accordance with the vendor’s guidelines. So, adding the ASR rules, Network protection, etc., would not change the test results and could increase the false positives rate. In MRG Effitas tests, the targeted attacks are included in the Exploit/Fileless part and this makes an important difference.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure&nbsp; &nbsp; :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" />Edit.The WD setup from this test is similar to ConfigureDefender HIGH settings (without ASR rules and Network Protection).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 919341, member: 32260"] I think that the setup was adjusted to the test scenario which does not include targeted attacks. The samples were gathered just like in the consumer tests (Home user scenario) and only the AV settings were applied in accordance with the vendor’s guidelines. So, adding the ASR rules, Network protection, etc., would not change the test results and could increase the false positives rate. In MRG Effitas tests, the targeted attacks are included in the Exploit/Fileless part and this makes an important difference.:unsure: Edit. The WD setup from this test is similar to ConfigureDefender HIGH settings (without ASR rules and Network Protection). [/QUOTE]

Verification