Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
CheckPoint vs Eset Protect vs GravityZone
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120510" data-attributes="member: 121355"><p>Damn….I can't edit anymore....</p><p></p><p>After this test, what are my impressions? Bitdefender scans slower with the network scanner and because of that there is a visible slowdown in the operation of opening "links". However, it looks solid in the action with samples. It reacts more confidently and the user has at least greater mental certainty. Strangely, Bitdefender thought long blocking the crack. Eset did it in a flash.</p><p>The fact is that Eset let the sample through and the connection to the server is impossible, but it let it through. The system with BD installed is completely clean. In my opinion, there is no draw. Bitdefender's minimal victory.</p><p>Here the situation was reversed and BD was second <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite115" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/shadowras-big-comparative-episode-2-paid-antivirus.134313/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>I'm missing something in this test or in every test</p><p>1. On-demand scan time. It's good to know how long the scan takes</p><p>2. During scanning, a window showing the resources used during scanning. CPU usage, RAM usage, and disk usage</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120510, member: 121355"] Damn….I can't edit anymore.... After this test, what are my impressions? Bitdefender scans slower with the network scanner and because of that there is a visible slowdown in the operation of opening "links". However, it looks solid in the action with samples. It reacts more confidently and the user has at least greater mental certainty. Strangely, Bitdefender thought long blocking the crack. Eset did it in a flash. The fact is that Eset let the sample through and the connection to the server is impossible, but it let it through. The system with BD installed is completely clean. In my opinion, there is no draw. Bitdefender's minimal victory. Here the situation was reversed and BD was second :p [URL unfurl="true"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/shadowras-big-comparative-episode-2-paid-antivirus.134313/[/URL] I'm missing something in this test or in every test 1. On-demand scan time. It's good to know how long the scan takes 2. During scanning, a window showing the resources used during scanning. CPU usage, RAM usage, and disk usage [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top