Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120686" data-attributes="member: 121355">Exactly. Bitdefender is a fat and lazy bear but when needed it knows how to attack - of course dangerously samples.Eset and Bitdefender are like fire and water, like two opposite poles.&nbsp;As you write, you haven&#039;t tested for a long time, so I&#039;m all the more curious how Eset v18 is doing.&nbsp;Nobody at home does tests and checks thousands of samples, but it needs a competitor who works, doesn&#039;t interfere, doesn&#039;t annoy and when it comes to reacting sometimes, it has to react.&nbsp;Since I&#039;m a fan of BD and now I&#039;m testing the Eset test version, I can admit (apart from the results in tests on thousands of samples because I don&#039;t do that) that today when I see how Eset behaves on the computer and it&#039;s heaven and earth in relation to BD, I would choose Eset.When I see how Eset is developing and how much more &quot;modern&quot; and better &quot;thought-out&quot; AV is, I believe that sooner or later Eset will be better than Bitdefender. Or at least it has a big chance of doing so.But I&#039;ll wait for a few more comparative tests because the Fsecure license ends in October so I have time.Thank you for the conversation, for a lot of information and for the exchange of views. Best regards <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120686, member: 121355"] Exactly. Bitdefender is a fat and lazy bear but when needed it knows how to attack - of course dangerously samples. Eset and Bitdefender are like fire and water, like two opposite poles. As you write, you haven't tested for a long time, so I'm all the more curious how Eset v18 is doing. Nobody at home does tests and checks thousands of samples, but it needs a competitor who works, doesn't interfere, doesn't annoy and when it comes to reacting sometimes, it has to react. Since I'm a fan of BD and now I'm testing the Eset test version, I can admit (apart from the results in tests on thousands of samples because I don't do that) that today when I see how Eset behaves on the computer and it's heaven and earth in relation to BD, I would choose Eset. When I see how Eset is developing and how much more "modern" and better "thought-out" AV is, I believe that sooner or later Eset will be better than Bitdefender. Or at least it has a big chance of doing so. But I'll wait for a few more comparative tests because the Fsecure license ends in October so I have time. Thank you for the conversation, for a lot of information and for the exchange of views. Best regards (y) [/QUOTE]

Verification