Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120795" data-attributes="member: 121355">Thanks for the replies. I&#039;ve been using Quad9 for years, even when it was part of Fsecure.I often follow the Polish website <a href="http://www.avlab.pl" target="_blank">www.avlab.pl</a>I think we didn&#039;t quite understand each other.Let&#039;s look at the test of this thread. In the video, time 9:16. [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] unpacks the crack from a password-encrypted packed file. Eset responds with its &quot;threat removed&quot; pop-up and we see two more windows on the Windows screen. One looks like a command line and the other is a Windows &quot;error&quot; &quot;Windows cannot find keygen....&quot;Next, we have Bitdefender and we see it differently. Time 15:06. Unpacking the crack and we only have a BD pop-up that notifies about the sample being blocked. Only the command line window flies by very quickly and the task is over. There is no Windows &quot;error&quot; with information in the pop-up.. What does it mean that it&#039;s the same sample but a different reaction? I&#039;m trying to understand the detection mechanism.However, now I also see a difference in web protection. I didn&#039;t notice it before. Not only is Eset faster in scanning, but in my opinion it does it better. Pages are blocked very quickly and we don&#039;t even have a pop-up Eset. BD downloads something and practically every page we have information in a pop-up that something has been blocked. In my opinion Eset does it much much better.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120795, member: 121355"] Thanks for the replies. I've been using Quad9 for years, even when it was part of Fsecure. I often follow the Polish website [URL="http://www.avlab.pl"]www.avlab.pl[/URL] I think we didn't quite understand each other. Let's look at the test of this thread. In the video, time 9:16. [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] unpacks the crack from a password-encrypted packed file. Eset responds with its "threat removed" pop-up and we see two more windows on the Windows screen. One looks like a command line and the other is a Windows "error" "Windows cannot find keygen...." Next, we have Bitdefender and we see it differently. Time 15:06. Unpacking the crack and we only have a BD pop-up that notifies about the sample being blocked. Only the command line window flies by very quickly and the task is over. There is no Windows "error" with information in the pop-up.. What does it mean that it's the same sample but a different reaction? I'm trying to understand the detection mechanism. However, now I also see a difference in web protection. I didn't notice it before. Not only is Eset faster in scanning, but in my opinion it does it better. Pages are blocked very quickly and we don't even have a pop-up Eset. BD downloads something and practically every page we have information in a pop-up that something has been blocked. In my opinion Eset does it much much better. [/QUOTE]

Verification