Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
CheckPoint vs Eset Protect vs GravityZone
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SeriousHoax" data-source="post: 1120853" data-attributes="member: 78686"><p>Without checking the logs, I can't tell why there was the difference. BD's detection on that sample seemed to be from its behavior blocker. But both products blocked it successfully. </p><p></p><p>I don't think ESET use the disk more than BD. Both products outside of the signature updating process, have low disk usage.</p><p></p><p>No direct negative effect but potentially reduces lifespan in the very long run. I'm a bit sensitive about it but from what I saw, most people don't care because nowadays SSDs have very high TBW values, so they last very long anyway. My not so expensive 1TB Nvme SSD's value is 200 TBW which is plenty. So, at the very least it can write 200 TB data. In 4.5 years, mine wrote 47 TB so far. So not even 1/4th of its limit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SeriousHoax, post: 1120853, member: 78686"] Without checking the logs, I can't tell why there was the difference. BD's detection on that sample seemed to be from its behavior blocker. But both products blocked it successfully. I don't think ESET use the disk more than BD. Both products outside of the signature updating process, have low disk usage. No direct negative effect but potentially reduces lifespan in the very long run. I'm a bit sensitive about it but from what I saw, most people don't care because nowadays SSDs have very high TBW values, so they last very long anyway. My not so expensive 1TB Nvme SSD's value is 200 TBW which is plenty. So, at the very least it can write 200 TB data. In 4.5 years, mine wrote 47 TB so far. So not even 1/4th of its limit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
