Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
CheckPoint vs Eset Protect vs GravityZone
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120869" data-attributes="member: 121355"><p>As for BD, I understand. And Eset? Didn't it use a behavior blocker to block the sample?</p><p>Such behavior of Eset with some pop-up windows is often seen in tests, for example on YT. BD does it more quietly, but it doesn't mean that such situations don't happen to it as well.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In about 20 days I will install BD TS and see how it looks. I hope you are right.</p><p>Yesterday I did a system scan with Eset (the automatic one - I think it is intelligent from the machine) and looked at the Windows device manager (I will just remind you that I have WIN10). It showed 45-51% of the disk value and about 385Mb/s. (it was displayed in strong yellow/light orange)</p><p></p><p></p><p>I checked CristalDiskInfo and it says 37TB. According to the manufacturer, my disk has a TBW of 641TB. But by the way - it shouldn't be like that. First, BD in the case of HDD tires the disk and second - in the case of SSD it overwrites so much data. I don't know how they can release such a poorly designed product to the market. Mega safe and effective but so half-baked. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite139" alt=":poop:" title="Poop :poop:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":poop:" /></p><p>And then you read in their marketing brochures that their employees teach at universities in Europe and are so great and yet they can't write AV programs....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120869, member: 121355"] As for BD, I understand. And Eset? Didn't it use a behavior blocker to block the sample? Such behavior of Eset with some pop-up windows is often seen in tests, for example on YT. BD does it more quietly, but it doesn't mean that such situations don't happen to it as well. In about 20 days I will install BD TS and see how it looks. I hope you are right. Yesterday I did a system scan with Eset (the automatic one - I think it is intelligent from the machine) and looked at the Windows device manager (I will just remind you that I have WIN10). It showed 45-51% of the disk value and about 385Mb/s. (it was displayed in strong yellow/light orange) I checked CristalDiskInfo and it says 37TB. According to the manufacturer, my disk has a TBW of 641TB. But by the way - it shouldn't be like that. First, BD in the case of HDD tires the disk and second - in the case of SSD it overwrites so much data. I don't know how they can release such a poorly designed product to the market. Mega safe and effective but so half-baked. :poop: And then you read in their marketing brochures that their employees teach at universities in Europe and are so great and yet they can't write AV programs.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top