Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
CheckPoint vs Eset Protect vs GravityZone
Message
<blockquote data-quote="IceMan7" data-source="post: 1120999" data-attributes="member: 121355"><p>I only showed disk usage. Eset does this type of disk load. Yesterday I did an EEK scan and RAM was well over 1GB but the disk was only at max 19% and about 80-90Mb/s. So there is a difference.</p><p>It does not scan constantly. It scans once a quarter, with the AV I have installed and some second opinion - EEK, NPE and HitmanPro.</p><p></p><p>I've already written a few times. Bitdefender is an AV that provides security and is currently at least one of the best. But I don't know and have never had such unfinished software. For years, something has been wrong there. There are always some fixes and updates. But still, others are constantly reported, because it can't work with some program or something blocks it. Or something doesn't work. I respect them for introducing some pioneering solutions (they are not the only ones who have researchers on ML or other solutions) and for their great effectiveness, but I won't praise them for the fact that they have had bug after bug for many, many years. It's like bragging that they have the fastest car but there are more in the service than I drive it. To finish - it's a shame that such a good security solution has never been refined for years. Apart from the fact that it is safe, wins numerous tests and has very good behavioral protection, it loses in other respects to almost every antivirus on the market. All the rest together doesn't have as many problems as Bitdefender itself.</p><p>And that's why it's still holding me back from returning to BD permanently.</p><p></p><p>All the rest catch up or are even better than BD. BD today really only has an advantage over most in behavioral protection.</p><p>The question is whether every user in the world clicks and runs anything they want these days. I don't think so. Users also don't run tests on their computers for a thousand or more samples.</p><p></p><p>Users today mainly need:</p><p>1. A good scanner that, after scanning the computer, ensures that nothing is in the system.</p><p>2. Good browser protection (because that's where we spend most of our time).</p><p>3. Protection against phishing, so that we don't download anything bad to our computer.</p><p>4. Banking protection.</p><p>5. Stable, lightweight AV that also doesn't make errors or interfere with using the computer.</p><p></p><p>Is BD the leader in these areas? I doubt it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>BD has a lot of work on the forum. The prepared tutorials and instructions show that they know that their software is underdeveloped.</p><p>Relax. They will issue fixes, update current solutions and add something new and then go back to square one. It's been the same for years. They will fix one thing and break another.</p><p>I'll find out in about 20 days. I'll install BD for 30 days and I'll see how it works.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="IceMan7, post: 1120999, member: 121355"] I only showed disk usage. Eset does this type of disk load. Yesterday I did an EEK scan and RAM was well over 1GB but the disk was only at max 19% and about 80-90Mb/s. So there is a difference. It does not scan constantly. It scans once a quarter, with the AV I have installed and some second opinion - EEK, NPE and HitmanPro. I've already written a few times. Bitdefender is an AV that provides security and is currently at least one of the best. But I don't know and have never had such unfinished software. For years, something has been wrong there. There are always some fixes and updates. But still, others are constantly reported, because it can't work with some program or something blocks it. Or something doesn't work. I respect them for introducing some pioneering solutions (they are not the only ones who have researchers on ML or other solutions) and for their great effectiveness, but I won't praise them for the fact that they have had bug after bug for many, many years. It's like bragging that they have the fastest car but there are more in the service than I drive it. To finish - it's a shame that such a good security solution has never been refined for years. Apart from the fact that it is safe, wins numerous tests and has very good behavioral protection, it loses in other respects to almost every antivirus on the market. All the rest together doesn't have as many problems as Bitdefender itself. And that's why it's still holding me back from returning to BD permanently. All the rest catch up or are even better than BD. BD today really only has an advantage over most in behavioral protection. The question is whether every user in the world clicks and runs anything they want these days. I don't think so. Users also don't run tests on their computers for a thousand or more samples. Users today mainly need: 1. A good scanner that, after scanning the computer, ensures that nothing is in the system. 2. Good browser protection (because that's where we spend most of our time). 3. Protection against phishing, so that we don't download anything bad to our computer. 4. Banking protection. 5. Stable, lightweight AV that also doesn't make errors or interfere with using the computer. Is BD the leader in these areas? I doubt it. BD has a lot of work on the forum. The prepared tutorials and instructions show that they know that their software is underdeveloped. Relax. They will issue fixes, update current solutions and add something new and then go back to square one. It's been the same for years. They will fix one thing and break another. I'll find out in about 20 days. I'll install BD for 30 days and I'll see how it works. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
