Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1088620" data-attributes="member: 67091">Facts of reality:1. The current Comodo&#039; version announced as “2025” is nothing more than the old Beta version, which due to lack of dedication was not only frozen for more than a year, but worse, this abandoned Beta was never finished, most of the five years old bugs remain unfixed, and the only thing Comodo has done is just new UI cosmetics.2. Comodo was never a great company and never had great products. For years, Comodo only had a single tool (sandbox/containment). Comodo&#039; fanatics built a false myth on top of this sandbox/containment, not only making people believe that it was unbeatable (which many times was already proven false), but worse, these fanatics also built the idea that a simple broken sandbox/containment is enough to label a software as &quot;the best and most complete security system&quot;. All of this is irresponsibly false and wrong.3. In the IT security world, no one invents the wheel, and there are good reasons to explain why the best security software never used sandbox/containment. There have been hundreds of security software over past decades, all promising the best &quot;ultimate solution&quot;. But none of these software products ever dared to use a simple broken sandbox/containment as an &quot;ultimate solution&quot;. Only Comodo&#039; fanatics insist that this broken sandbox/containment is the &quot;ultimate solution&quot;.4. The Comodo&#039; website was always a disaster, but this is not just a coincidence, this is the Comodo&#039; classic pattern behavior, reflected on every Comodo&#039; product: Old, abandoned, useless and full of bugs.5. Any conclusion of any expert is always published with the identification of the expert, verifying his technical training &amp; experience, and fundamentally verifying the veracity of his tests and statements, describing in detail the necessary information (allowing to universally reproduce same tests and conclusions).The participants here at MalwareTips are subjective opinion holders, they are not experts (or at least, they never documented their supposed expertise).Subjective opinions and cute videos with nice music... are not proof of anything.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1088620, member: 67091"] Facts of reality: 1. The current Comodo' version announced as “2025” is nothing more than the old Beta version, which due to lack of dedication was not only frozen for more than a year, but worse, this abandoned Beta was never finished, most of the five years old bugs remain unfixed, and the only thing Comodo has done is just new UI cosmetics. 2. Comodo was never a great company and never had great products. For years, Comodo only had a single tool (sandbox/containment). Comodo' fanatics built a false myth on top of this sandbox/containment, not only making people believe that it was unbeatable (which many times was already proven false), but worse, these fanatics also built the idea that a simple broken sandbox/containment is enough to label a software as "the best and most complete security system". All of this is irresponsibly false and wrong. 3. In the IT security world, no one invents the wheel, and there are good reasons to explain why the best security software never used sandbox/containment. There have been hundreds of security software over past decades, all promising the best "ultimate solution". But none of these software products ever dared to use a simple broken sandbox/containment as an "ultimate solution". Only Comodo' fanatics insist that this broken sandbox/containment is the "ultimate solution". 4. The Comodo' website was always a disaster, but this is not just a coincidence, this is the Comodo' classic pattern behavior, reflected on every Comodo' product: Old, abandoned, useless and full of bugs. 5. Any conclusion of any expert is always published with the identification of the expert, verifying his technical training & experience, and fundamentally verifying the veracity of his tests and statements, describing in detail the necessary information (allowing to universally reproduce same tests and conclusions). The participants here at MalwareTips are subjective opinion holders, they are not experts (or at least, they never documented their supposed expertise). Subjective opinions and cute videos with nice music... are not proof of anything. [/QUOTE]

Verification