Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1097924" data-attributes="member: 114717">Nothing needs to change.The fact that the product is given away at $0 always has and will determine its &quot;quality.&quot;If you developed a product, supported its infrastructure, paid for the personnel to support it, plus all the other expenses and then gave it away to the world for $0, then you too would not be willing to expend the resources required to make it &quot;polished.&quot; You would set a budget and stick to it.It makes no sense whatsoever to put a lot of effort or resources into something that generates $0 in profit (100% free).This basic principle - &quot;The Rule of Free&quot; - so simple a 5 year old child understands it. No other explanation for the &quot;quality&quot; of Comodo is required. Which, given it is 100% free, it outperforms a lot of paid security software.Let&#039;s take a look in the mirror... you need to change your vinyl. Because you keep saying the same thing over-and-over without regard to the fact that Comodo is a profitless, 100% free product. On that basis one cannot expect bug-free or top AV, phishing, etc modules (which none of those are needed anyways).Someone once said &quot;Well Microsoft does not charge home users for Defender&quot; and while that is technically true, it is not 100% free. All the home users are Microsoft&#039;s guinea pigs and are sharing data &amp; files with Microsoft without ever knowing it. If data sharing or telemetry is required or enabled by default or not easily disabled, then the product is not 100% free. The payment is in a form that is not money.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1097924, member: 114717"] Nothing needs to change. The fact that the product is given away at $0 always has and will determine its "quality." If you developed a product, supported its infrastructure, paid for the personnel to support it, plus all the other expenses and then gave it away to the world for $0, then you too would not be willing to expend the resources required to make it "polished." You would set a budget and stick to it. It makes no sense whatsoever to put a lot of effort or resources into something that generates $0 in profit (100% free). This basic principle - "The Rule of Free" - so simple a 5 year old child understands it. No other explanation for the "quality" of Comodo is required. Which, given it is 100% free, it outperforms a lot of paid security software. Let's take a look in the mirror... you need to change your vinyl. Because you keep saying the same thing over-and-over without regard to the fact that Comodo is a profitless, 100% free product. On that basis one cannot expect bug-free or top AV, phishing, etc modules (which none of those are needed anyways). Someone once said "Well Microsoft does not charge home users for Defender" and while that is technically true, it is not 100% free. All the home users are Microsoft's guinea pigs and are sharing data & files with Microsoft without ever knowing it. If data sharing or telemetry is required or enabled by default or not easily disabled, then the product is not 100% free. The payment is in a form that is not money. [/QUOTE]

Verification