Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
CIS 2025 is now LIVE!
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trident" data-source="post: 1098252" data-attributes="member: 99014"><p>It will not be a problem if this is a device that is dedicated to testing, properly isolated in a lab. If you are doing that on the same device that you use to shop for clothes, be it in a VM, it is plain dumb.</p><p></p><p>I already discussed pre-execution vs post-execution protections on another thread, as well as here.</p><p></p><p>This is not a personal statement or an essay, it is the point of view of every security specialist, based on facts.</p><p></p><p>You can contact a few and enquire, and see who will advise you to allow malware to be ran on your real machine and then to press "block connection "/ "Contain" -- and will consider this optimal, recommended security. Compared to a solution that will prevent execution or even download.</p><p>They will be laughing at you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>How come you didn't find this evidence, when it was just there, in Rubenking's rather unadvanced and incompetent tests...?</p><p>Or you just don't want to open your eyes and see it?</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, Comodo audience is extremely small and very highly technical. Such audience deals with potential security incidents, doesn't go on forums to cry on somebody's shoulder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trident, post: 1098252, member: 99014"] It will not be a problem if this is a device that is dedicated to testing, properly isolated in a lab. If you are doing that on the same device that you use to shop for clothes, be it in a VM, it is plain dumb. I already discussed pre-execution vs post-execution protections on another thread, as well as here. This is not a personal statement or an essay, it is the point of view of every security specialist, based on facts. You can contact a few and enquire, and see who will advise you to allow malware to be ran on your real machine and then to press "block connection "/ "Contain" -- and will consider this optimal, recommended security. Compared to a solution that will prevent execution or even download. They will be laughing at you. How come you didn't find this evidence, when it was just there, in Rubenking's rather unadvanced and incompetent tests...? Or you just don't want to open your eyes and see it? Furthermore, Comodo audience is extremely small and very highly technical. Such audience deals with potential security incidents, doesn't go on forums to cry on somebody's shoulder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top