Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Helmut" data-source="post: 1098269" data-attributes="member: 113650">1) Of course I assume that this is not done on a PC on which I have sensitive data or temporarily save it for processing - please don&#039;t think I&#039;m that stupid. But even on a lab PC I would do both. That&#039;s why I tried to prevent misunderstandings, which you seem to want to misunderstand. That won&#039;t work. 2) I did it for myself to be sure that I had reliable protection or whether there were any loopholes. You wanted to misunderstand that too. Then read [USER=114717]@bazang[/USER]&#039;s post again: factual, objective. That&#039;s why I&#039;m going to say goodbye here now, I don&#039;t feel like answering people who want to misunderstand me. Closing words: No problems for decades, protected for decades on all Windows versions, laptops, programs, working with sensitive data. No rootkits, worms or other burglars for decades. The IT specialist who introduced me to Comodo knew a lot more than those here who don&#039;t want to accept it and just bashing Comodo. Many thanks also to [USER=114717]@bazang[/USER] - he encouraged me and I&#039;m now sticking with Comodo. It may be that Bitdefender or Norton would have done the same, but why do some people have problems with ransomware and rootkits and I didn&#039;t? It&#039;s a fact and not a bedtime story - that&#039;s why I was afraid that it would lead to deliberate misunderstandings, even though I meant it openly.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Helmut, post: 1098269, member: 113650"] [SIZE=4]1) Of course I assume that this is not done on a PC on which I have sensitive data or temporarily save it for processing - please don't think I'm that stupid. But even on a lab PC I would do both. That's why I tried to prevent misunderstandings, which you seem to want to misunderstand. That won't work. 2) I did it for myself to be sure that I had reliable protection or whether there were any loopholes. You wanted to misunderstand that too. Then read [USER=114717]@bazang[/USER]'s post again: factual, objective. That's why I'm going to say goodbye here now, I don't feel like answering people who want to misunderstand me. Closing words: No problems for decades, protected for decades on all Windows versions, laptops, programs, working with sensitive data. No rootkits, worms or other burglars for decades. The IT specialist who introduced me to Comodo knew a lot more than those here who don't want to accept it and just bashing Comodo. Many thanks also to [USER=114717]@bazang[/USER] - he encouraged me and I'm now sticking with Comodo. It may be that Bitdefender or Norton would have done the same, but why do some people have problems with ransomware and rootkits and I didn't? It's a fact and not a bedtime story - that's why I was afraid that it would lead to deliberate misunderstandings, even though I meant it openly.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]

Verification