Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
General Apps
VPN and DNS
CleanBrowsing DNS vs NextDNS vs ControlD DNS
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SohanRay" data-source="post: 981079" data-attributes="member: 94632"><p>Actually I did. Here's their Answer:</p><p></p><p>The primary reason that Quad9 is lower on DNS performance charts, like <a href="http://dnsperf.com/" target="_blank">dnsperf.com</a>, is because we depend on peering at internet exchanges to route end users to the closest-possible location. Many of our locations do not have "transit". You can think of transit as telling the whole internet that Quad9 is at a certain location; while peering at internet exchanges is telling only the local networks that Quad9 is at that location. As a result, if an ISP is not available at a local internet exchanges, or refuses to peer with us, the users on that network will be routed to the closest-possible location with transit, which is not always so close. </p><p> </p><p>As Quad9 is a nonprofit that depends solely on donations and sponsors, transit is unfortunately the most-difficult resource to receive from a sponsor, as it's typically more expensive than data center space, power, and hardware.</p><p> </p><p>We're constantly trying to increase our peering arrangements so we can get as much local traffic to the local locations as possible. At this very moment, we're conducting a peering audit so we can enable dozens more peers at internet exchanges around the world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SohanRay, post: 981079, member: 94632"] Actually I did. Here's their Answer: The primary reason that Quad9 is lower on DNS performance charts, like [URL='http://dnsperf.com/']dnsperf.com[/URL], is because we depend on peering at internet exchanges to route end users to the closest-possible location. Many of our locations do not have "transit". You can think of transit as telling the whole internet that Quad9 is at a certain location; while peering at internet exchanges is telling only the local networks that Quad9 is at that location. As a result, if an ISP is not available at a local internet exchanges, or refuses to peer with us, the users on that network will be routed to the closest-possible location with transit, which is not always so close. As Quad9 is a nonprofit that depends solely on donations and sponsors, transit is unfortunately the most-difficult resource to receive from a sponsor, as it's typically more expensive than data center space, power, and hardware. We're constantly trying to increase our peering arrangements so we can get as much local traffic to the local locations as possible. At this very moment, we're conducting a peering audit so we can enable dozens more peers at internet exchanges around the world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top