Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Clearsight Antivirus Premium 2022
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TedCruz" data-source="post: 1013445" data-attributes="member: 95937"><p>And frankly it should be free, since why overload your system with a secondary real time scanning solution that uses definitions vs something that is supplemental like an anti-executable? Windows Defender is already heavy as it is, so to add another real-time virus scanner is just in my own personal opinion a very bad IT practice. Besides, what happens if one engine catches the virus and attempting to clean it while the second engine is also acting up on the detection? How is the dual detection regime handled? In the past, when one ran two separate engines from two separate AV companies, then there was a chance of letting an infection through, just based on that conflict of who gets the file first and who locks it out. Since now, both engines are fighting for dominance over the rights to the file.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TedCruz, post: 1013445, member: 95937"] And frankly it should be free, since why overload your system with a secondary real time scanning solution that uses definitions vs something that is supplemental like an anti-executable? Windows Defender is already heavy as it is, so to add another real-time virus scanner is just in my own personal opinion a very bad IT practice. Besides, what happens if one engine catches the virus and attempting to clean it while the second engine is also acting up on the detection? How is the dual detection regime handled? In the past, when one ran two separate engines from two separate AV companies, then there was a chance of letting an infection through, just based on that conflict of who gets the file first and who locks it out. Since now, both engines are fighting for dominance over the rights to the file. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
