Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
ClearURLs
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 866811" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>Firstly and about NeatURL, the JS' script doesn't need to be updated, tracking removal mechanism has been the same for the last 10 years. NeatURL works like a charm.</p><p>And with regards to RegExps, this also is not related to updates, because the add-on already contains by default 90% of the most known url tracker parameters (but if you want to customize it, be my guest, the add-on allows you to include whatever url tracker parameter you want! In fact, you can copy all url tracking parameters from CleanURL, and paste inside NeatURL). Around 20.000 users seem very satisfy with NeatURL.</p><p></p><p>Secondly, I have been using SkipRedirect for years, it is extremely rare to see the add-on breaking something. Most of the 26.000 users can confirm my argument.</p><p></p><p>I tested intensively all similar add-ons. The best combo in terms of browser efficiency is NeatURL + SkipRedirect.</p><p>It's a waste of resources to have hundred of RegExps (like CleanURLs has), when users normally are going to use just a few of them on daily browsing. The logic here is similar to blocking list, users don't need large blocking lists with millions of parameters. Browser performance always should be the main focus, and if few RegExps can block 90% of url tracking parameters... that's enough.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 866811, member: 67091"] Firstly and about NeatURL, the JS' script doesn't need to be updated, tracking removal mechanism has been the same for the last 10 years. NeatURL works like a charm. And with regards to RegExps, this also is not related to updates, because the add-on already contains by default 90% of the most known url tracker parameters (but if you want to customize it, be my guest, the add-on allows you to include whatever url tracker parameter you want! In fact, you can copy all url tracking parameters from CleanURL, and paste inside NeatURL). Around 20.000 users seem very satisfy with NeatURL. Secondly, I have been using SkipRedirect for years, it is extremely rare to see the add-on breaking something. Most of the 26.000 users can confirm my argument. I tested intensively all similar add-ons. The best combo in terms of browser efficiency is NeatURL + SkipRedirect. It's a waste of resources to have hundred of RegExps (like CleanURLs has), when users normally are going to use just a few of them on daily browsing. The logic here is similar to blocking list, users don't need large blocking lists with millions of parameters. Browser performance always should be the main focus, and if few RegExps can block 90% of url tracking parameters... that's enough. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top