Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1100212" data-attributes="member: 114717">The &quot;reviews&quot; that I have seen Decopi post have been nothing more than personal opinion posts on websites that provide good reviews only by software publishers that pay.[USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] at AVLab.pl is a leading industry expert, and a very well respected one on that. His advanced tests are the only ones of their kind in the industry. He does not do them very often because he does not charge the software publisher for the testing. He only charges them if they want the test detail reports.The attacks on [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] &#039;s video demonstrations are more about attacking her and what she does than they are about what is shown in the video. Launching malware from the desktop is an entirely valid test method. Anyone that says otherwise either does not understand malware testing and\or is just being argument for the sake of being argumentative.Nobody has ever supplied an in-the-wild malware that bypasses Comodo&#039;s containment whereas thousands of malware have bypassed Avast, Bitdefender, Kaspersky, Norton, etc.Relative to built-in Microsoft Defender, people could do a lot worse than choose to use Comodo.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://avlab.pl/en/test-software-online-banking-protection/[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://avlab.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/avlab_drive_by_download_test_en.pdf[/URL][URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://avlab.pl/en/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Malware_Fileless_Protection_Test_EN.pdf[/URL]There&#039;s more but I&#039;m sure it is pointless as you will only counter-argue that these and a whole bunch of other independent test results are somehow flawed and misleading to the general public.[USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] configures the test systems with various tools to monitor for any changes on the OS. So if during the &quot;dwell time&quot; the malware was making serious malicious changes to the OS outside of Comodo&#039;s containment then he would have reported it.Everybody knows Comodo has bugs. That does not mean it is a terrible software. Software intrinsically has bugs. So the complaints about Comodo&#039;s bugs are vastly overstated.Have you been to a Bitdefender discussion? The first thing that happens are people complaining about Bitdefender&#039;s bugs. &quot;Bugdefender.&quot;CS settings take about 2 minutes, if that.Essentially, CS configuration is the equivalent of a heavily tweaked and hardened Sandboxie in about 5 steps, whereas customizing Sandboxie takes about 30 minutes and requires the knowledge to do it. An idiot can follow the CS configuration video and succeed.Are there &quot;better&quot; - as in &quot;install it and forget about it&quot; - software? Of course. Nobody here ever denied it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1100212, member: 114717"] The "reviews" that I have seen Decopi post have been nothing more than personal opinion posts on websites that provide good reviews only by software publishers that pay. [USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] at AVLab.pl is a leading industry expert, and a very well respected one on that. His advanced tests are the only ones of their kind in the industry. He does not do them very often because he does not charge the software publisher for the testing. He only charges them if they want the test detail reports. The attacks on [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] 's video demonstrations are more about attacking her and what she does than they are about what is shown in the video. Launching malware from the desktop is an entirely valid test method. Anyone that says otherwise either does not understand malware testing and\or is just being argument for the sake of being argumentative. [B]Nobody has ever supplied an in-the-wild malware that bypasses Comodo's containment whereas thousands of malware have bypassed Avast, Bitdefender, Kaspersky, Norton, etc.[/B] Relative to built-in Microsoft Defender, people could do a lot worse than choose to use Comodo. [URL unfurl="true"]https://avlab.pl/en/test-software-online-banking-protection/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://avlab.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/avlab_drive_by_download_test_en.pdf[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://avlab.pl/en/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Malware_Fileless_Protection_Test_EN.pdf[/URL] There's more but I'm sure it is pointless as you will only counter-argue that these and a whole bunch of other independent test results are somehow flawed and misleading to the general public. [USER=71496]@Adrian Ścibor[/USER] configures the test systems with various tools to monitor for any changes on the OS. So if during the "dwell time" the malware was making serious malicious changes to the OS outside of Comodo's containment then he would have reported it. Everybody knows Comodo has bugs. That does not mean it is a terrible software. Software intrinsically has bugs. So the complaints about Comodo's bugs are vastly overstated. Have you been to a Bitdefender discussion? The first thing that happens are people complaining about Bitdefender's bugs. "Bugdefender." CS settings take about 2 minutes, if that. Essentially, CS configuration is the equivalent of a heavily tweaked and hardened Sandboxie in about 5 steps, whereas customizing Sandboxie takes about 30 minutes and requires the knowledge to do it. An idiot can follow the CS configuration video and succeed. Are there "better" - as in "install it and forget about it" - software? Of course. Nobody here ever denied it. [/QUOTE]

Verification